[
Sure, now you can have the comparisons, they can't play baseball so they have to create something different for them. Basically supporters of softball are sexist.
Nooo, that would make it even sillier. It wouldn't even make me happier if they played baseball. It would just take away the sexist silliness of it.
And all the rules are to make it easier for women (pretty sexist if you ask me). Softball is something different than baseball, a different game. (just ask Pinot, he knows, he's been coaching for 20+ years)[/quote]
Pretty big leap there, Meyers - basically stating that because the game is different, it is designed to be easier, and that because it is different, it is inherently sexist. Further, you say that they "can't" play baseball - I suspect, until fairly recently (my two sister's generation, actually), girls were either not allowed to play, or actively discouraged from playing. "Can't" play is one thing, being prevented from playing is another. My mother, nearly 88, played baseball as a girl with the boys in the neighborhood (her dad, my grandfather, was a very good amateur player who played with Ruth in at least one summer league, back when the Babe was still a bit of a babe.) But, once my mom neared puberty, no more baseball! No opportunity, and, certainly not socially acceptable.
As anybody who has ever played knows, a "softball" isn't appreciably softer than a baseball - and, it's heavier. Playing the infield, particularly the corner positions and pitcher, requires reflexes at least as fast as those in baseball, as you are much closer to the batter (in the case of 3rd base, you may literally be half the distance than in baseball). Arguably, hitting a softball is harder than hitting a baseball in three ways, and easier in one. Identifying the "easier" aspect is, well, easy - the ball is bigger. That's also one of the ways in which it's harder - being heavier, with more air resistance/friction, it's harder to hit the softball for a distance. But, the two biggest reasons it can be harder to hit a softball is 1). the pitching rubber is 43 ft away. With pitchers hitting nearly 70mph from this distance, the batter's reaction time is that of a baseball player facing somebody throwing in the mid-nineties or higher. The greatest difficulty, I think, is that created by the seams on the softball - the larger seams allow pitchers to move the ball up, down, in and out, and they can change speeds dramatically (watch the College world series, and see how the skilled pitchers change speed by up to 15 mph, with no discernable variation in arm speed.)
And, as for softball being designed for the "weaker sex". Has anybody pitched both games of a baseball double-header since Wilbur Wood? Or started on multiple consecutive days? Happens all the time in softball.
In short, I think you can make a pretty good argument that softball is harder than baseball.