Same here with my Parker session. There are way to many positives that probably half the FBS doesn't have in regards to facilities,While Thamel’s story is newsworthy, it isn’t new to us. This was from my post on October 1st on the listening session with the head of the Parker search firm.
I was also in one of the listening sessions. The best thing I heard was that the powers in the state (Governor LaMont--Majority leaders in the statehouse, University BOT) are all-in on rejuvenating the program and are committed to paying the $$$. "Money will not be an issue in who UConn hires". Heard a lot about us getting more active in the portal---and protecting our young talent at year end from being enticed to enter it. Also, the search firm rep said our Independence is not a big negative and that DB deftly carved an interesting schedule and TV deal.
He has always "got it" the problem has always been convincing othersThis is an example of AD Dave being competent. He saw a need to get this story out there. That’s an indication that he gets it.
From the article, so no, it's not as hard as most think on a national level ( and we can also add NC St. , BC, Purdue, Indiana and Illinois as H & H's that DB has also scheduled )I think the biggest struggle with the scheduling will be quality home games. P5 road games shouldn't be that hard to find, all with decent payouts. Can UConn get 2-3 quality home games a year? That will be the question going forward.
UConn*This was a good move by DB and Governor Lamont to show all potential head coaches that UCONN is committed to big-time football for the foreseen future. There is absolutely no reason why UCONN can't be as successful as programs like BYU and Boise State. UCONN can schedule big time, and be competitive with the right coach.
DB can't screw up the next hire. DB has to hire a proven coach that can get UCONN competitive again.
True, when's the last time a Cuse grad ever wrote anything positive about Uconn.Even worse - when that national writer is PETE THAMEL. It's bizarro world.
this should always be the Number One goal of the entire athletic department. Get out of the Big East and into our rightful place in the P5.During the campaign, Lamont floated the idea of UConn getting into the ACC. Let's get that as a goal.
SO, what does he think UConn should have done? Stay in the AAC that has been decimated by conference realignment that would have destroyed almost all sports at UConn? UConn got out of the AAC before they had to go. The Big 12 was going to add schools and it was pretty obvious from the last round of the Big 12 expansion process that UConn was not a top choice. Of course, all of us would like to be in the ACC of Big 10, but we are not. In my opinion, the independent schedule >>>> AAC schedule.… and then you have The Day:
Can UConn football be saved? Experts: ‘a solid maybe’
-> Schedule, schedule, schedule. This was, by far, the biggest criticism lobbed at UConn's current hierarchy. The schedule, as one person said, "is like manure in the garden. It's all over the place." <-
The full article is worth a click.
While there is a risk of the Alliance cutting down OOC games in the Power 5 (and I am skeptical this happens due to logistical issues and potential for one conference to poach the other), a lot of these schools have fans in the northeast they want to cater to, while it sucks that stadium isn't on campus being close to Bradley makes it easy to fly into, and the biggest reason of all: most P5 schools don't want to or aren't capable of shelling out $1-2 million for multiple buy games a season and would rather just return the game.I think the biggest struggle with the scheduling will be quality home games. P5 road games shouldn't be that hard to find, all with decent payouts. Can UConn get 2-3 quality home games a year? That will be the question going forward.
Actually, we were one of the top choices in the last round. That doesn't necessarily mean we would have been this round though. UConn is a bad fit in the Big 12 geographically. After the Texas OU exit, given the uncertainty about it's future, I think it could be a mistake to move, even if we got an invite. Now while we were in the AAC, it definitely made sense.he Big 12 was going to add schools and it was pretty obvious from the last round of the Big 12 expansion process that UConn was not a top choice.
Hey, it’s a start. The lesson is you can’t cut corners. Paying up means not only the head coach but getting the staff behind him that can execute and deliver. You can see how a weak understaff can kill you like last week… and last year and the year before that-> There’s already a solid financial commitment, which is in line with the lower end of the AAC. UConn is paying on-field assistant coaches $2 million and off-field staff $1.2 million. That’s not exactly Clemson commitment, but it's a total staff commitment of $4.4 million accounting for the head coach salary. There’s an openness to that number increasing.
“We’ve got to go out and hire the right football coach,” Benedict said. “I believe that we’ll have the support. If it requires a little bit more to do that, we’ll have the support to do that. Money doesn’t necessarily automatically translate to wins. It’s more of identifying the right person.” <-
Keep the partisan politics out (forewarned).
-> It’s an easy time to pick on University of Connecticut football. The Huskies are 0-7, jettisoned coach Randy Edsall in early September and got thumped, 27-13, by their struggling neighbor, the University of Massachusetts, on Saturday.
But any notion of UConn punting on football, de-emphasizing football or angling for football to drop down a division is strongly disputed. That includes a chorus of leadership ranging from athletic director David Benedict to the head of the school’s board to Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont. They all view top-flight football as an integral part of UConn being a first-class public school.
“I’m all in,” Lamont told Yahoo Sports in a phone interview. “Look, we have a national university. People identify universities with the academics, the beauty of the campus and the high quality of sports you put on a national platform. People pay attention. They know our basketball far and wide. Football is the national sport, in many ways. We’ve got to compete.”
But any notion of UConn punting on football, de-emphasizing football or angling for football to drop down a division is strongly disputed. That includes a chorus of leadership ranging from athletic director David Benedict to the head of the school’s board to Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont. They all view top-flight football as an integral part of UConn being a first-class public school.
“I’m all in,” Lamont told Yahoo Sports in a phone interview. “Look, we have a national university. People identify universities with the academics, the beauty of the campus and the high quality of sports you put on a national platform. People pay attention. They know our basketball far and wide. Football is the national sport, in many ways. We’ve got to compete.” <-
...and that differs from the rest of this season how? It's about looking forward at this point.Good money after bad. Our last three games we will set a record as a 50 point dog, in three consecutive games.
UCF aint that good this year, tbhGood money after bad. Our last three games we will set a record as a 50 point dog, in three consecutive games.
So....if we don't beat UCF, do we go winless?UCF aint that good this year, tbh
Thank you for your interest in big time UConn college athletics.Good money after bad. Our last three games we will set a record as a 50 point dog, in three consecutive games.