- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
- Messages
- 553
- Reaction Score
- 282
One of many studies on the subject from ther Economist...Just Google "studies on the effects of travel on athletes."
I'm finished on this subject.
Despite travelling in relative luxury, disruptio
n to an athlete’s circadian rhythm is unavoidable. Confirming a widely-held rule of thumb, German researchers found that the deterioration in motor function of athletes after long trips lingered for roughly as many days as the number of time zones they crossed. In a competitive context, a range of studies suggests that these effects are meaningful only beyond certain distances. An investigation of Major League Baseball applied the one-day-per-time-zone theory, measuring whether teams enjoyed a “circadian advantage” over opponents who were less in sync with the local time. Teams with a three-hour advantage—the maximum possible in North America—won 61% of their games, versus a 52% winning percentage for both one- and two-hour advantages. Another studyshowed that east-coast teams scored 1.24 more runs than usual in the first two days against teams that travelled in from the west coast.
These effects are similar in other sports. Over the past 15 seasons in the National Football League, visiting teams that travel less than 1,000 miles won 43% of their games, versus 40% when travelling 2,000 miles or more. An older study found statistical significance only among west-coast teams, who saw their away-game winning percentage fall by 16% when playing on the east coast, compared with travelling within their home time zone.
Interestingly, the directional effect is reversed for basketball: teams crossing the country from west to east...
Most of Indiana is in eastern time zone, some parts central. Perhaps NDs travel to CT will help even the odds and/or balance uconn's now fully documented and proven lag.
Just askin...