Couldn't agree more. Have no idea why someone is applauding South Carolina. As if they just won the national championship or something. Those polls actually placing South Carolina ahead of Oregon is a joke in and of itself to begin with.
Of course we will never know but I would bet that South Carolina wasn't going to win it all.
You are right about Oregon too. If anything I thought from the beginning that it was their year all along....
Remember when South Carolina was first ranked #1 by the AP Poll, it was Baylor - not Oregon - who was the Coach's #1 for several weeks. And Baylor was #2 behind USC in the AP Poll. Then USC passed Baylor, and Baylor was consensus #2 for a while until they lose their what, final regular-season game? Only then did Oregon move up to #2. And while USC stayed #1 in the polls, BOTH Oregon AND Baylor would lose their 2nd games of the season. USC wouldn't lose another game during this stretch.
Maybe Oregon is better than South Carolina versus how they played against ranked opponents in 2019-20:
Against ranked opponents:
Top 3-ranked: USC is 3-0, Oregon is 1-0
Top 5-ranked: USC is 5-0, Oregon is 5-1
Top 25-ranked: USC is 12-1, Oregon is 11-2
OK, well, top 25 rankings from polls are pretty subjective anyways. RPI is based on how well the teams do against quality opponents - perhaps that's a better metric:
Against Q1 (Top 50 RPI) opponents:
Top 10 Q1 RPI: USC is 5-0, Oregon is 4-1
Top 25 Q1 RPI: USC is 8-1, Oregon is 7-1
Top 30 Q1 RPI: USC is 13-1, Oregon is 10-1*
Top 50 Q1 RPI: USC is 12-1, Oregon is 11-2
* I did the top 30 because it goes from 10 to 25 (15 spots), then from 25 to 50 (25 spots). So an opponent just outside of the top 25 is a tougher opponent than one just inside the top 50. As it was, USC was 3-0 versus 31-50 RPI Q1 opponents, while Oregon was 1-1 with the loss to Arizona State. 24-8 20th ranked and #14 RPI Indiana was South Carolina's "bad" loss, while 20-11 25th-ranked and #40 RPI Arizona State was Oregon's "bad" loss.
No one will truly know who the best team of 2019-2020 is unfortunately, with the cancellation of the NCAAT. Both USC and Oregon were pretty side-by-side in terms of overall SOS, # of ranked opponents played, and # of Q1 Tier RPI opponents played. But South Carolina pretty much edges out Oregon in every box - only Oregon played 1 more top 5 ranked opponents than USC did, but they also lost to one of those. One could use the SOS to justify putting a 2-loss team over a 1-loss one - even a team that has lost more recently than the other, but when they are fairly equal, and in fact the other team has done it slightly better, it makes it harder to reconcile....