bballnut90
LV Adherent. Topic Crafter
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2011
- Messages
- 8,379
- Reaction Score
- 39,601
Pretty cool to see coaches give direct credit to other teams they learn from.
Along with Aliyah crying after the missed shot at Stanford.Yeah. Every final 4 they show both of them. Every single year.
He works for ESPN, ESPN owns the SEC network, ESPN controls, $, the WCBB tournament. UCONN basically plays in a mid major conference, ESPN pushes the big guys.Charlie Crème just said during the LSU vs Mississippi State game that with Iowa’s win he’s moving UConn down to the 3 line. Man he just loves to knock UConn down whenever he has a chance. ,,
There is literally no bigger draw for ESPN on the NCAA tournament — which it owns the broadcast rights to — than UConn.He works for ESPN, ESPN owns the SEC network, ESPN controls, $, the WCBB tournament. UCONN basically plays in a mid major conference, ESPN pushes the big guys.
I agree. We are getting pretty big, but UConn still draws the most eyeballs and generates the most stories. Now, the two together . . .There is literally no bigger draw for ESPN on the NCAA tournament — which it owns the broadcast rights to — than UConn.
Maryland just clobbered them by 28. Clark is special but I’d definitely put betting money on Maryland for that game.I think Iowa would be favored in a rematch with Maryland in the BTT semis. They missed a lot of open shots in that blowout loss.
True but ESPN owns among others the SEC network and promotes them. Also ESPN broadcasts the major sport football UConn not relevant there.There is literally no bigger draw for ESPN on the NCAA tournament — which it owns the broadcast rights to — than UConn.
Both teams had offensive explosions against the other AT HOME.Maryland just clobbered them by 28. Clark is special but I’d definitely put betting money on Maryland for that game.
Come on now, UConn has been the face of WBB for decades now, partially in part to due to ESPN coverage. At one point if there was only 60 seconds of WBB coverage , UConn would get 45-50 of those seconds. This season is way below their standard and their two biggest media darlings have been hurt and sidelined for most of the year.True but ESPN owns among others the SEC network and promotes them. Also ESPN broadcasts the major sport football UConn not relevant there.
Both teams had offensive explosions against the other AT HOME.
A neutral site game would be interesting,
Was, now there is the SEC and ACC etworks owned by ESPN, the BTN network owned by ESPN rival Fox (BTW Indiana on there often). UConn in 2023 not financially connected to any of those. In 2023 ESPN has a financial stake not in UConn or the BE.Come on now, UConn has been the face of WBB for decades now, partially in part to due to ESPN coverage. At one point if there was only 60 seconds of WBB coverage , UConn would get 45-50 of those seconds. This season is way below their standard and their two biggest media darlings have been hurt and sidelined for most of the year.
If you think ESPN has it out for UConn then only imagine what fans of other programs feel. Look at Indiana, they are the #2 team in the country and who I believed until recently had the front runner in NPOY Mackenzie Holmes but she got no media attention. Even the promo for college GameDay was all about Caitlin.
As for 3 seed prediction, I don't think it was as personal as some believe. UConn was on the lower half of the 2 seed rankings as it was and they have been struggling with some average teams lately. With Iowa winning against the #2 team it only makes sense they swap places with someone. If they win the Big East tournament they'll be back as a 2 seed for sure.
And yet one of the biggest names and most used names on ESPN today is Caitlin Clark. In recent years we have seen Paige, Azzi, Sabrina, Cameron Brink and more get tons of love and attention from the likes of ESPN. This network bias conspiracy theory does hold much weight.Was, now there is the SEC and ACC etworks owned by ESPN, the BTN network owned by ESPN rival Fox (BTW Indiana on there often). UConn in 2023 not financially connected to any of those. In 2023 ESPN has a financial stake not in UConn or the BE.
Isn't BTN independent from Fox and they just recently agreed to broadcasting rights?Was, now there is the SEC and ACC etworks owned by ESPN, the BTN network owned by ESPN rival Fox (BTW Indiana on there often). UConn in 2023 not financially connected to any of those. In 2023 ESPN has a financial stake not in UConn or the BE.
From ForbesIsn't BTN independent from Fox and they just recently agreed to broadcasting rights?
Where does the mention of bias comes in. Who won national player of the year last year? Clark was as good last year.And yet one of the biggest names and most used names on ESPN today is Caitlin Clark. In recent years we have seen Paige, Azzi, Sabrina, Cameron Brink and more get tons of love and attention from the likes of ESPN. This network bias conspiracy theory does hold much weight.
And last year she got just as much coverage too. My point is that ESPN highlights players in conferences that they aren't associated with all the time. I believe outside of Boston and Reese I would argue the players that are being pushed the most are not in those conferences at all.Where does the mention of bias comes in. Who won national player of the year last year? Clark was as good last year.
Good points all around, GCKSFN4L, except I'd be curious to know at what point this season you think Holmes was the front-runner over Clark for NPOY? In many other seasons, Mackenzie well could have won it with her performance this year.Come on now, UConn has been the face of WBB for decades now, partially in part to due to ESPN coverage. At one point if there was only 60 seconds of WBB coverage , UConn would get 45-50 of those seconds. This season is way below their standard and their two biggest media darlings have been hurt and sidelined for most of the year.
If you think ESPN has it out for UConn then only imagine what fans of other programs feel. Look at Indiana, they are the #2 team in the country and who I believed until recently had the front runner in NPOY Mackenzie Holmes but she got no media attention. Even the promo for college GameDay was all about Caitlin.
As for 3 seed prediction, I don't think it was as personal as some believe. UConn was on the lower half of the 2 seed rankings as it was and they have been struggling with some average teams lately. With Iowa winning against the #2 team it only makes sense they swap places with someone. If they win the Big East tournament they'll be back as a 2 seed for sure.
Iowa is a top 10 team, all top 10 teams have their weakness (SC is rock solid) and Caitlin covers up a lot of those but if the third or more options on offense are hitting (Martin, Warnock, Marshall) Iowa is really tough to beat.When talking about a team recently Charlie said "I was right all along." He likes to be "right all along." In that regard, he can't quite quit Iowa. He had them in his top 4 preseason. He'll take every opportunity to move them closer to where he had them early on so he can say ...
Anyhow, the next step for Clark is the more challenging one: leading her team on a deep tournament run. As magical as yesterday was, this Iowa team has weaknesses that even superwoman Clark can't overcome. In the Big 10 tournament getting past Maryland will be very difficult. I would expect another match-up with Indiana to end differently. As for the NCAAT, no more 2nd round exits and they have to hope for a favorable bracket.
I felt that way for much of the later half of the season. She had amazing stats, led her team to #2 in the nation and stepped up when Berger was out. All while shooting at almost 70%.Good points all around, GCKSFN4L, except I'd be curious to know at what point this season you think Holmes was the front-runner over Clark for NPOY? In many other seasons, Mackenzie well could have won it with her performance this year.
I agree. Clark is otherworldly but I just thought Holmes was absolutely phenomenal and I’d vote for her today.I felt that way for much of the later half of the season. She had amazing stats, led her team to #2 in the nation and stepped up when Berger was out. All while shooting at almost 70%.
Personally she would get my vote even today, but I believe she lacked the proper media attention. Clark technically was always a front runner this season, but I thought Holmes really had a great and consistent season. She was my personal frontrunner with her productivity and efficiency while also standing out on a great team. Holmes winning was always going to be a longshot but that storybook buzzer beater by Clark sealed the deal for sure.