I must be missing something here. Is Cane Broome good? He's a 6-foot guard (and that's probably being generous) who is a 33% career three point shooter, posts about a 1:1 assist to turnover ratio over three seasons, and certainly didn't promise anything defensively. And he's averaging 8 points per game right now for Cincinnati in his junior year after they burned a scholarship so he could sit out last year.
I mean, in hindsight, he'd make this team better and he makes Cincinnati better. But Ollie was making that call three Gilbert shoulder dislocations ago, before MAL had de-committed (and I know he hadn't committed by that point but Ollie had to have known he was in the driver's seat), before the Diallo fiasco, and before he plucked Vital late in the period who I still prefer to Broome as a player. And no, it was not obvious that Hamilton was going to the draft.
They were 100% right to not offer him a ship.
As is commonly the case, your analysis and argument are measured, reasonable, and fact-based.
Here is something you might be missing, and I offer this in the spirit of being helpful to both you and
@willie99:
I 'double-read' The Boneyard a lot. The first time I scroll down the page, I don't see the comments from those I ignore. (Heck, I miss entire posts if I'm logged in, like Scrappy's query on Glen Miller). On my second take, I click on "Show Ignored Content" and see who inspired outrage, as well as hissy fits between the relentlessly annoying from all points of view. Yes,
@whaler11, I do this too. It fills some time I used to spend watching good basketball.
Here's where I'm going with this - there have only been 2 comments made here by posters I ignore. These anguished barbs are not coming from the pitchfork crowd. It doesn't matter that you can accurately claim that 20-20 hindsight paints a false picture when perception so frequently beats reality in emotional matters.
And not for nothing, a sixth man who puts up 3.3 assists a game sounds good to me.