- Joined
- Feb 5, 2016
- Messages
- 199
- Reaction Score
- 1,371
I think it's "If a man speaks and there is not woman there to hear him is he still wrong?"If a tree falls in the woods, and there is no one there to hear it, does it make a sound.
I think it's "If a man speaks and there is not woman there to hear him is he still wrong?"If a tree falls in the woods, and there is no one there to hear it, does it make a sound.
Well it seems that over 80% of the athletes in the Olympic village have already been vaccinated. 99% of the infections reported are among those who have not been vaccinated. So that leaves about 2200 athletes that are at risk. Those are the people that have thrown the dice, and those are the people who should be worried. Now, the number of severe breakthrough infections among vaccinated populations is about 0.003%, so among the vaccinated in the village that number is vanishingly low. So whether we see among the unvaccinated a nasty outbreak only time will tell.Without saying one way or the other, I had expected to hear a long list (exponential growth) of athletes in the COVID protocols but I have not? Am I missing something?
Actually, they will move to a baseball stadium nearer Tokyo after opening ceremonies, apparently. Still will be the baseball venue as well.I believe it frequently happens for team sports such as baseball, basketball, soccer and hockey. But I don’t remember it being quite this early. In the case of softball, they are playing all the games on one field, which happens to be the same field they will play the baseball tournament on, once the softball tournament raps up next week.
I think the list will grow once all of the athletes arrive in the Olympic Village. Many are still not there. Last I read, there have been 60 reported cases in the village. That includes staff, athletes, and anyone else in there. Not sure how many athletes are actually there right now but a total of 11,000 athletes will, at some time, be in the Olympic Village. The list will unfortunately grow.Without saying one way or the other, I had expected to hear a long list (exponential growth) of athletes in the COVID protocols but I have not? Am I missing something?
While this is true, it is astounding to me that Japan’s vaccination number is 8%!Vaccination is not protection for others. It is for the protection of the individual who is vaccinated. If Japan was at 0.00000000000% vaccinated, it would not affect the protection of those who have the antibodies (do to having contract CoViD-19 in the past 6 months, nor those who have been vaccinated with an effective vaccine, nor those with a robust immune system with NO co-morbigities.
By the way, FEAR is a huge immuno-surpressant. If you are afraid, don't go! If you have a tendency to talk yourself into fear over time, don't go.
Fear NOT!!! Go Huskies!!! Stay strong (particularly your immune systems)!!!!!
I don't know, ask Jazz, Littlemin, et. al.I think it's "If a man speaks and there is not woman there to hear him is he still wrong?"

Did Katie Lou test positive before heading to Japan? If so, what does this have to do with the Olympics?My cancellation argument can be summed in six words:
Katie Lou Samuelson and Asia Durr
It appears that she tested positive.Did Katie Lou test positive before heading to Japan? If so, what does this have to do with the Olympics?
Covid is getting worse every day and the number of people dying is on the rise. It is already starting to look like the Olympics will be a super spreader event. Athletes may be fine taking the risk for themselves, but they can give it to others who can give it to others. It is heartbreaking what Asia Durr is going through, and we don't even know what KLS is dealing with. I don't want anyone to get sick much less a beloved Husky. I don't think I will be able to watch.Did Katie Lou test positive before heading to Japan? If so, what does this have to do with the Olympics?
60 cases already? That is ridiculous! All athletes should have been vaccinated period. When everybody arrives the real super spreader will soon be upon us. I don't think the cardboard beds that are in the village will discourage the "international friendship" that has been occurring for decades between participants. The host nations always provide protection materials to the athletes, but this is a whole different ballgame. I hope these athletes are smart enough to think about that, but then again, these are mostly kids and they don't always make the right decision. I pray that they do.I think the list will grow once all of the athletes arrive in the Olympic Village. Many are still not there. Last I read, there have been 60 reported cases in the village. That includes staff, athletes, and anyone else in there. Not sure how many athletes are actually there right now but a total of 11,000 athletes will, at some time, be in the Olympic Village. The list will unfortunately grow.
The ones I really feel for are the ones who are vaccinated yet still get a positive result. The new variant is having a higher success rate of breaking through the vaccine. However, the vaccine is protecting those who have it from serious Illness. That doesn't mean they aren't eliminated from the Games though....
Unless the tree falls in a vacuum, the sound is transmitted through the air. Even if the tree falls in a vacuum, the sound is still transmitted through the ground - simple physics. Vibrations that are tarnsmitted = sound.
Sound can be detected by instrumentation that detects vibration. Human ears need not be present for sound to be generated. It's a physics thing.Sound is the impression that the bones in your ear places upon your brain based upon the vibrations they receive. If there are no ears to receive the vibrations created from a fallen object ( in or out of a vacuum) there will be no “sound”.
In my first day in a philosophy class at UConn, the professor asked the infamous "if a tree falls in the woods..." question. I looked up at him and said yes. He said but can you prove it? I said sure and at his invitation did a math style proof on the board with the givens that objects can't occupy the same place and that air occupies space, as does the tree, and that sound was the movement of air. The professor stared at it for a good what seemed liked a good a five minutes and then when someone in the class said "Uh professor?" He said "Class dismissed" and kept staring at the board. People looked at me like "WTH dude" and I was like "He shouldn't have asked if he didn't want the answer."Unless the tree falls in a vacuum, the sound is transmitted through the air. Even if the tree falls in a vacuum, the sound is still transmitted through the ground - simple physics. Vibrations that are tarnsmitted = sound.
You gave a philosophy professor a math/physics style explanation.In my first day in a philosophy class at UConn, the professor asked the infamous "if a tree falls in the woods..." question. I looked up at him and said yes. He said but can you prove it? I said sure and at his invitation did a math style proof on the board with the givens that objects can't occupy the same place and that air occupies space, as does the tree, and that sound was the movement of air. The professor stared at it for a good what seemed liked a good a five minutes and then when someone in the class said "Uh professor?" He said "Class dismissed" and kept staring at the board. People looked at me like "WTH dude" and I was like "He shouldn't have asked if he didn't want the answer."
(I may have broken him since the next class we had a different professor who taught the class for rest of the semester. Good times.)

The majority of the Japanese people in their homeland of Japan are wholistic and natural health people. They refuse to have untested or incompletely tested medicine that is not made from natural sources, AND being vaccinated is completely voluntary. I would suspect that most of those '8% of the population' who are vaccinated in Japan are less than third generation Japanese nationals who accepted the risk of the vaccine.While this is true, it is astounding to me that Japan’s vaccination number is 8%!
AWESOME!!!! I would have high fived with you at the end of the first class AND the start of the second class!In my first day in a philosophy class at UConn, the professor asked the infamous "if a tree falls in the woods..." question. I looked up at him and said yes. He said but can you prove it? I said sure and at his invitation did a math style proof on the board with the givens that objects can't occupy the same place and that air occupies space, as does the tree, and that sound was the movement of air. The professor stared at it for a good what seemed liked a good a five minutes and then when someone in the class said "Uh professor?" He said "Class dismissed" and kept staring at the board. People looked at me like "WTH dude" and I was like "He shouldn't have asked if he didn't want the answer."
(I may have broken him since the next class we had a different professor who taught the class for rest of the semester. Good times.)
Sound is the impression that the bones in your ear places upon your brain based upon the vibrations they receive. If there are no ears to receive the vibrations created from a fallen object ( in or out of a vacuum) there will be no “sound”.
Physics vs metaphysics, perspective wins againSound can be detected by instrumentation that detects vibration. Human ears need not be present for sound to be generated. It's a physics thing.
Not at all. Now giving a math professor a philosophy style explanation... that takes courage.You gave a philosophy professor a math/physics style explanation.
Very courageous
Much more practical question...I think it's "If a man speaks and there is not woman there to hear him is he still wrong?"
Submariners tend to take sound seriously.Physics vs metaphysics, perspective wins again
It's really definitional. Is sound the movement of air or the impact of that movement on a human ear drum? The latter is kind of silly standard since we know animals can hear, but that is how the question is traditionally posed. I used the former definition as a given in my proof, so the proof was largely irrelevant. The givens decided the issue. The professor wasn't sophisticated enough to spot it otherwise he would challenged me on the givens.Physics vs metaphysics, perspective wins again
I concur with your assessment of your professor, and I am in the same 'boat' as David Hume [273-ish years ago], except that I am NOT in favor of burning books NOR cancelling discussion:It's really definitional. Is sound the movement of air or the impact of that movement on a human ear drum? The latter is kind of silly standard since we know animals can hear, but that is how the question is traditionally posed. I used the former definition as a given in my proof, so the proof was largely irrelevant. The givens decided the issue. The professor wasn't sophisticated enough to spot it otherwise he would challenged me on the givens.
But my question would be is metaphysics illusion or dillusion?If we take in our hand any volume [book]; of school metaphysics, for instance; let us ask, Does it contain any abstract reasoning concerning quantity or number? No. Does it contain any experimental reasoning concerning matter of fact and existence? No. Commit it then to the flames: for it can contain nothing but sophistry and illusion. Hume, David (1748). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. §132. - see wikipedia for more dissenting opinions; this reference is good enough for me...