There's a new sheriff in town. Would a fresh set of eyes see the unfair penalty? Or do you need a UConn law degree to figure out our whole retroactive double whammy bull? Pun intended.
It would obviously be perceived as a conflict of interest by non-UConn fans if the ban was somehow overturned. Not what the new Commish needs to start his tenure.
The purpose of the tournament is to decide a conference champion and the automatic qualifier to the NCAA tournament - it's not in the conference's best interests to let UConn play.
I'm not even sure it's in UConn's best interests - not sure we would need to hear an entire week's worth of ESPN vitriol about the evils of UConn advancing round by round.
The purpose of the tournament is to decide a conference champion and the automatic qualifier to the NCAA tournament - it's not in the conference's best interests to let UConn play.
I'm not even sure it's in UConn's best interests - not sure we would need to hear an entire week's worth of ESPN vitriol about the evils of UConn advancing round by round.
Wait didn't you post that you run the tourny and have the best "qualified" team earn the tourny berth? UConn gets to play in MSG for a week and whomever gets the bid.
It wouldn't be the first thing I'd do as commissioner but I'd consider if it meant addtional revenue (and it does.)
It's also pretty convenient for the BE to drop us to bring the number of teams to an even number. With WVU out and their replacement not coming for another year they had to either exclude 1 team or give another team a bye.
good point. scratch my theory.It's not hard to schedule the BET with an odd number of teams. You could just give one more team a first round bye (9 1st round byes and the same 4 2nd round byes).