Can Paige and Azzi both average 20ppg? | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Can Paige and Azzi both average 20ppg?

Joined
Jan 16, 2018
Messages
3,037
Reaction Score
16,314
For me, I doubt it. And I have a couple reasons.

1. Sarah - she's also scoring at a good clip
2. Team isn't generating enough free throws
3. Too many good healthy players at the moment where you get everybody eats games
4. Azzi would need to really focus in on a KLS type game where she is getting significant 3s per game at high percent. Like 5+ a game to raise the points per attempt. Not likely because her game is more diverse
 
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
785
Reaction Score
4,954
This is an eye opening post! If someone had tried to tell me that Stewie didn't average 20 points in any of her UConn seasons, I would have to think that they were not being truthful. Same the others you mentioned.
Based upon UConn history, I guess my post about Paige, Azzi and Sarah averaging 20 points seems ludicrous.
Most of Stewies games they were blowing out opponents and sat entire fourth quarters. So we need some context to this topic.
 

Centerstream

<----- She's back!
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
8,819
Reaction Score
35,054
Most of Stewies games they were blowing out opponents and sat entire fourth quarters. So we need some context to this topic.
My thought was that UConn was blowing out opponents in part because of Stewie's scoring in the first three quarters or so. And also because of Morgan, Moriah, Kia, Gabby, Naphessa, Katie Lou, etc. but mostly Stewie.
 
Joined
Apr 25, 2024
Messages
285
Reaction Score
1,306
Probably not, judging from history. And by history &0, it is with reference to the TASSK years that intersects with Shea and Svet (1998-99, 1999-00, 2000-01):
  • By regular season’s end, Geno will have a solid 10-player Noah’s Ark rotation as the 2nd year of TASSK consisting of 9 players who had been starters at some point in their (short) UConn careers + Morgan (whom Geno really likes);
  • Aside: To those who say Dawn is pioneering balanced Superteam play, for the first three years of TASSK, Geno was already doing that; he won one championship from 1998-2001, with injuries derailing the other two years.
There are metrics &2 that can better illustrate the Big 3’s impact without pegging it to a near impossible 60-point Big 3 season average standard;
  • Besides scoring, the Big 3 (who have not meaningfully played together in the previous 16 games) will force defenses to work extra hard and are floor spacers;
  • Early season defensive schemes on Paige and Sarah, while the four other incomers and four sophomores were being developed &1 by Geno, will not now work;
  • With a fully functioning Big 3 + Aubrey and seasoned-enough youngsters, the focus on the Big 3 will let the seasoned youngsters shine as by-game designated hitters;
  • yes, this means &1 hitting the good open shots missed in the early season, at a much faster pace, unleashing the press after each made shot, etc.
&0 History is not always prologue. The Back2Sports guy goes through Paige’s and Azzi’s prior “ships-passing-through-the-night” joint play as a prologue to this season. He also projects from the 16-game performance of Kaitlyn+KK (vs Nika) as prologue to the rest of the season. I don’t agree with his takes on either one.

&1 Q is an illustrative case. Finally focusing on what she can contribute to Geno’s schemes — better rebounding, defending the opponent’s hottest player, being connected on offense/ defense (along the lines of a long line of Geno players from Ashley Battle, Kalana Greene, Barbara Turner, Kelly Farris, … , Aubrey Griffin and perhaps Bianca Quinones) — Geno rewards Q with non-garbage time minutes;
  • Q is currently on a shooting slump as she now grapples with Geno’s very high team play bar;
  • Similar situation was faced by the available players at the start of the year not named Paige or Sarah —relative newbies in new situations with the departure of Nika and Aaliyah.
&2 The Hollinger Assist Ratio (Assists / Offensive Possessions ending in a player’s actions = A / PAct) is one such metric;
  • Turnover Percentage (TO / PAct) is another;
  • One can bootleg a stat for offensive contribution as (FGM + A) / PAct;
  • Since UConn is among the nation’s best in scoring efficiency, Assists, TOs, it is probably near the very top for team average for the above ratios;
  • These and other metrics will show that this year’s UConn team is becoming a vintage UConn team a la TASSK years.
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2022
Messages
6,965
Reaction Score
42,419
Probably not, judging from history. And by history &0, it is with reference to the TASSK years that intersects with Shea and Svet (1998-99, 1999-00, 2000-01):
  • By regular season’s end, Geno will have a solid 10-player Noah’s Ark rotation as the 2nd year of TASSK consisting of 9 players who had been starters at some point in their (short) UConn careers + Morgan (whom Geno really likes);
  • Aside: To those who say Dawn is pioneering balanced Superteam play, for the first three years of TASSK, Geno was already doing that; he won one championship from 1998-2001, with injuries derailing the other two years.
There are metrics &2 that can better illustrate the Big 3’s impact without pegging it to a near impossible 60-point Big 3 season average standard;
  • Besides scoring, the Big 3 (who have not meaningfully played together in the previous 16 games) will force defenses to work extra hard and are floor spacers;
  • Early season defensive schemes on Paige and Sarah, while the four other incomers and four sophomores were being developed &1 by Geno, will not now work;
  • With a fully functioning Big 3 + Aubrey and seasoned-enough youngsters, the focus on the Big 3 will let the seasoned youngsters shine as by-game designated hitters;
  • yes, this means &1 hitting the good open shots missed in the early season, at a much faster pace, unleashing the press after each made shot, etc.
&0 History is not always prologue. The Back2Sports guy goes through Paige’s and Azzi’s prior “ships-passing-through-the-night” joint play as a prologue to this season. He also projects from the 16-game performance of Kaitlyn+KK (vs Nika) as prologue to the rest of the season. I don’t agree with his takes on either one.

&1 Q is an illustrative case. Finally focusing on what she can contribute to Geno’s schemes — better rebounding, defending the opponent’s hottest player, being connected on offense/ defense (along the lines of a long line of Geno players from Ashley Battle, Kalana Greene, Barbara Turner, Kelly Farris, … , Aubrey Griffin and perhaps Bianca Quinones) — Geno rewards Q with non-garbage time minutes;
  • Q is currently on a shooting slump as she now grapples with Geno’s very high team play bar;
  • Similar situation was faced by the available players at the start of the year not named Paige or Sarah —relative newbies in new situations with the departure of Nika and Aaliyah.
&2 The Hollinger Assist Ratio (Assists / Offensive Possessions ending in a player’s actions = A / PAct) is one such metric;
  • Turnover Percentage (TO / PAct) is another;
  • One can bootleg a stat for offensive contribution as (FGM + A) / PAct;
  • Since UConn is among the nation’s best in scoring efficiency, Assists, TOs, it is probably near the very top for team average for the above ratios;
  • These and other metrics will show that this year’s UConn team is becoming a vintage UConn team a la TASSK years.
I like your optimism, even if the stats invoked in &2 are still obscure to me. And I especially like your suggestion about Q. Like many of us, I thought she had lost her way. I’d noticed that she’s been hawking rebounds much more aggressively than last season, but I didn’t weigh it appropriately. But you have clearly paid more attention than I had and seen her season so far not as a backwards slide but as a diagonal improvement. She’s changing her game to meet Geno’s expectations. Her offense has suffered a bit, but if you’re right, it will bounce back. Go Q!
 

Blueballer

Transhumanist Consultant
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
5,252
Reaction Score
16,237
3 scorers is ideal. Paige, Azzi and Sarah can fill those roles. Without much scoring from the centers, those 3 will have to be "on" for us to get where we need to be.
 
Joined
May 30, 2020
Messages
1,320
Reaction Score
4,626
This is an eye opening post! If someone had tried to tell me that Stewie didn't average 20 points in any of her UConn seasons, I would have to think that they were not being truthful. Same the others you mentioned.
Based upon UConn history, I guess my post about Paige, Azzi and Sarah averaging 20 points seems ludicrous.
Reminds me of the question asked about Michael Jordan prior to the NBA finals where he was about to earn his 4th NBA Championship [when he was averaging >35 pts/game in the playoffs]: "How do you keep Michael Jordan under 16 points per game?"

Answer: Have him play for Dean Smith!

I'm thinking that 2 of 3 of them [Azzi, PB, & Sarah] would score over 20 pts each game they are in for 28 - 32 mins. The issue will be that they will average 24 - 26 minutes [only exceptions are Tennessee and USCarolina] until the BE Tournament finals where they each will have ~30 mins, which {~30 mins/game} will continue in the NCAAs.

Because of the reduced mins played over the next 12 games, I predict that only one or two of the "Big 3" will score in the 20's until the BE finals.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
7,023
Reaction Score
27,862
If we want #12, the answer to can all 3 score 20 better be yes.

The only number that matters is the total those 3 get in any game. If all 3 are hot they could get 80 but in many games one will be missing from 3. If they can score 50 between them and the rest (5) can get 30 between them we would win because of our defense.

I don't remember the season ( 2014-2016?) but at one point in February I noticed that every starter had had a 30 pt game during the season. It's the proven scoring potential that matters. Between Bueckers, Fudd and Strong Geno has 3 players who can put up 30+. That may not guarantee anything but it is a piece of the puzzle.
 
Last edited:

bballnut90

LV Adherent. Topic Crafter
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
7,486
Reaction Score
33,650
It's not happening this year--Geno is pulling starters earlier in Big East play and there's only 1 game of note left on the schedule (at South Carolina).

I think a better target or indicator of success is to have 2 of Strong/Bueckers/Fudd score close to 20 on a given night, or combine for 40. Those are the 3 main offensive weapons UCONN has, and none of them are likely to be gunners who jack up bad shots, so if someone is off, the other two + supporting cast can pick up the slack.
 

Online statistics

Members online
226
Guests online
2,074
Total visitors
2,300

Forum statistics

Threads
160,793
Messages
4,238,763
Members
10,093
Latest member
Verna


.
Top Bottom