What are you talking about? The 2017-18 roster has 6 big men whose game doesn't extend more than 5 feet from the basket, 2 small forwards (Larrier, Polley), and 4 guards (Adams, Vital, Gilbert, Anderson). Half the roster is given over to the interior game.
Moreover of the guards 3 are point guards. There's only 3 players who fit your description of "2's, 3's, and 4's who want to play as 3's".
I don't know if that's actually true anymoreCalhoun picked Ollie.....and they still talk....that's fine by me.
You're right, it's been a crazy fall off with Ollie only winning an NCAA Championship in 20% of the seasons he's coached. Calhoun didn't exactly hand the program to Ollie in pristine condition, but we have a lot of fans with amnesia on this board. People should be more pissed at Warde Manuel and Susan Herbst for botching the conference realignment, but I guess Ollie will be their fall guy instead.
Quite the delusion here. Do you really think a .500 post-season bid average is acceptable (.400 if UCONN doesn't make the big dance this season)? I don't have anything against Ollie, but come on... A (below) .500 tourney bid record doesn't cut it with me (or any other sane fan of an elite basketball program). What tells/insight do you have that suggest him turning it around? Let's not be another Kentucky-Tubby Smith and hang on way longer than we should have.
Again, just stop. These last two seasons have been among the worst in the post 85 era. We could easily miss the NCAA again this season.
Have to disagree on that...Calhoun had some years that were much worse than last year (and without injuries). For all of you who seem to think UConn made the NCAA tournament every year under Calhoun you may want to go back and check your facts. Calhoun actually never (NOT ONCE) strung together more than 3 NCAA tournament appearances in a row. So we are now expecting Ollie to do what JC never could? Again, without all the injuries last year that is a tournament team and we're making the tourney 3 out of every 4 years which is exactly what JC did. Our margin of error is smaller in the AAC, so we need our team firing on all cylinders in November (again something that JC's teams didn't typically do or need to do).
Sorry to let facts, data and history get in the way of your shotty judgement.
Have to disagree on that...Calhoun had some years that were much worse than last year (and without injuries).
Have to disagree on that...Calhoun had some years that were much worse than last year (and without injuries). For all of you who seem to think UConn made the NCAA tournament every year under Calhoun you may want to go back and check your facts. Calhoun actually never (NOT ONCE) strung together more than 3 NCAA tournament appearances in a row. So we are now expecting Ollie to do what JC never could? Again, without all the injuries last year that is a tournament team and we're making the tourney 3 out of every 4 years which is exactly what JC did. Our margin of error is smaller in the AAC, so we need our team firing on all cylinders in November (again something that JC's teams didn't typically do or need to do).
Sorry to let facts, data and history get in the way of your shotty judgement.
Just for some perspective... here is Calhoun's record at UConn his first 6 years as the head coach:
133-86 (.607)
And here is Kevin Ollie's record in his first 5 years as coach:
113-61 (.649)
In order for them to be equal in winning percentage we would have to go 10-20 this year.
Yes, you can argue Calhoun was coaching in a tougher conference, but he also came in with prior experience as a head coach at a D1 program. Let's just keep this in mind before calling for Ollie's replacement.
You are misrepresenting lots of things. Calhoun strung together FIVE straight NCAA tournament appearances from 2002 to 2006, and other than his first season, NEVER had a losing record at UConn. You can support Ollie all you want, but don't try to do it by misrepresenting JC's accomplishments. The man turned an average program into an elite program.