Calhoun never saved scholarships | The Boneyard

Calhoun never saved scholarships

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
27,766
Reaction Score
71,195
If he had eight scholarships he would recruit eight players.

Ollie seems like he is husbanding his resources a little more. Saving a couple for next year.
 

Penfield

a.k.a PencilForest
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
9,263
Reaction Score
9,793
I am fine with this. Some of the recruits we brought in toward the end of the Calhoun Era probably shouldn't have been recruited in the first place. This only led to more transfers and eventually killed our APR.
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
2,957
Reaction Score
5,401
This is true. Comes with a price though. If you have 13 scholarship players and a 9 man rotation, you're going to have 4 guys at the end of the bench who might be grumpy enough to transfer and potentially hurt APR.
 
C

Chief00

Also let's not fool ourselves we have scholarships left over because we missed on guys. But, I agree let's not go after real marginal players to just fill the rooster.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
3,560
Reaction Score
8,271
JC also never said "ten toes in". He said "why the #%$@ are you late?" "What the $%&# was that?"

Different times different methods. Although if some 4 star big man comes around from Juco or whatever- I could see him pulling the trigger.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
1,485
Reaction Score
1,997
This year all are filled. Right now only one available for next year, could fill in spring. If DD leaves or Boat that would free up two more but he wants to wait and see. If they leave he could fill with post grad players or just keep as our only 2015 opening. We need to have 2-3 openings for 2015.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
6,096
Reaction Score
19,277
We also have had guys who were clearly going to turn pro early in the past. I don't think you can say that about Boat/DD. They certainly might, but handing out their scholarships is jumping the gun.

Plus, we've used the fifth-year transfer option twice which Calhoun never used. Makes more sense to get an RJ Evans for one year instead of a Darius Smith/Jamaal Trice for one year.

We missed some targets, but ended up signing guys in their spots (Cassell instead of Perkins, Snider; Lubin instead of Abu, Larrier, Colson).

I like where we're at - we can wait on Boat/DD, fish in the spring for a late bloomer, fifth-year transfer or a regular transfer, and if Boat/DD go and there's nothing in the spring, we have no seniors next year so we can recruit 15s without forcing anyone out.
 

Mike Honcho

I've lost count of titles
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,451
Reaction Score
8,754
I am fine with this. Some of the recruits we brought in toward the end of the Calhoun Era probably shouldn't have been recruited in the first place. This only led to more transfers and eventually killed our APR.


Agree completely. I love Calhoun but there were times during the offseason when he handled the team like a GM and that always made me uncomfortable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
221
Guests online
2,391
Total visitors
2,612

Forum statistics

Threads
160,182
Messages
4,220,261
Members
10,083
Latest member
ultimatebee


.
Top Bottom