Buy Games - Dare We Hope For Competition? | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Buy Games - Dare We Hope For Competition?

Kinda OT but I hope we end up playing Indiana in the Empire Classic. Stephon Castle's teammate in HS, Jakai Newton is a freshman there this season.
 
I have a different view.

I think the quality of these Euro opponents is better than we think, and we are just that good.

I bet we win a good number of our Quad 1 games in humiliating blowouts.
 
are you sure? two seasons ago the men only generated $755k in revenue for single-game tickets for the entire season. that's an average of $44k per home game and a buy game costs twice that on average. i'm not counting season ticket revenue but people arent buying those to see stonehill.
Very clever of you to not count season tickets, food and beverages, merch, parking and such.

What is the real number? I don't know. If they were losing money some bean counter would find even cheaper (worse) opponents.
 
This. It wouldn’t kill us to have some of the buy games be against a mid-level A Ten team or a strong MAAC team.

The A10 is interesting in this regard in that many of their teams don’t want to “get bought.” They try to work out home and homes when possible or some kind of 2 and 1 deal, maybe with a neutral location involved.
 
I have a different view.

I think the quality of these Euro opponents is better than we think, and we are just that good.

I bet we win a good number of our Quad 1 games in humiliating blowouts.
stephen colbert oh no you didnt GIF
 
.-.
Another thing you can waste too much time on is trying to decide which of identical twins looks the more alike.
Depends which one you're comparing them to.
 
are you sure? two seasons ago the men only generated $755k in revenue for single-game tickets for the entire season. that's an average of $44k per home game and a buy game costs twice that on average. i'm not counting season ticket revenue but people arent buying those to see stonehill.

Coming into a mask wearing quarantine season? Quite frankly Im glad you non mask wearing dreck stayed out.,
 
Actually I'm an optimist on that score. I've always thought it silly to believe that everyone now living is going to die when no one now living ever has.
They say there’s no two people on earth exactly the same. No two faces, no two sets of fingerprints. But do they know that for sure? Cuz they would have to get everybody together in one huge space. And obviously that’s not possible even with computers. But not only that, they’d have to get all the people that ever lived, not just the ones now. So they got no proof. They got nothin.
 
They say there’s no two people on earth exactly the same. No two faces, no two sets of fingerprints. But do they know that for sure? Cuz they would have to get everybody together in one huge space. And obviously that’s not possible even with computers. But not only that, they’d have to get all the people that ever lived, not just the ones now. So they got no proof. They got nothin.
You're going a little deeper than I dare to dig, but I subscribe 100% to your last two sentences.
 
Very clever of you to not count season tickets, food and beverages, merch, parking and such.

What is the real number? I don't know. If they were losing money some bean counter would find even cheaper (worse) opponents.
i dont know i could only find ticket revenue but cheaper would mean better not worse opponents because they wouldnt be buy-games at all
 
.-.
Another thing you can waste too much time on is trying to decide which of identical twins looks the more alike.
Yeah, but remember, a lot of people get tripped up on this because it's different for boys than it is for girls.
 
They say there’s no two people on earth exactly the same. No two faces, no two sets of fingerprints. But do they know that for sure? Cuz they would have to get everybody together in one huge space. And obviously that’s not possible even with computers. But not only that, they’d have to get all the people that ever lived, not just the ones now. So they got no proof. They got nothin.
People thought it would be easier once computers weren't as big as rooms, because more people could fit into the space. But it didn't work out that way.
 


Haven't paid attention to scheduling this year but why the assumption UConn won't play Yale, and not the other way around.

It's not as simple as calling up Yale and saying "X date Y time, Z amount of money, Gampel."

Yale may not want the game this year as they want to build their resume, pad their wins to get a better seed if they win the Ivy, etc. Or they think they are good enough to warrant something they don't (return game, more money, different day/time, etc.)
 
Haven't paid attention to scheduling this year but why the assumption UConn won't play Yale, and not the other way around.

It's not as simple as calling up Yale and saying "X date Y time, Z amount of money, Gampel."

Yale may not want the game this year as they want to build their resume, pad their wins to get a better seed if they win the Ivy, etc. Or they think they are good enough to warrant something they don't (return game, more money, different day/time, etc.)

Yale has a 30 billion dollar endowment, they should pay us.
 
I have to buy games all the time. Is there an alternative?

If you build a field, people will come. We're zombies, and hanging with the boys, drinking, nice dinner.. are pretty cool byproducts
 
.-.

I cannot explain why UConn and Yale do not play each other, as has been requested. I can take note that Yale beat UConn 9 years ago when the two teams last played. And I can note that Rutgers last played in-state Ivy League school Princeton 10 years ago and lost.

Rutgers will play Princeton this year in November in Trenton.

Without either broad or deep knowledge regarding all factors that go into scheduling, I personally would favor a steady rotation at multiple CT sites with UConn playing each of Connecticut's D-1 schools. In other words, I'd like a couple games (or more) scheduled each season against Yale, Quinnipiac, Fairfield, Sacred Heart, and/or Central, with the games scheduled at XL, Total Mortgage, Mohegan Sun, and/or Gampel.

In my aforementioned ignorance, I don't know why this would be unworkable and not worth considering. Without such informed feedback, I imagine that fan bases from each of the other schools would like to see their team play in a big-time atmosphere against the state's elite program. I also imagine that such games would have higher attendence and wider value for local fans, and that it would translate into greater economic value for Hartford, Bridgeport, Storrs, and Uncasville.

I'd appreciate it if someone would be willing to politely explain how this series of games wouldn't be an improvement over what is currently done with visiting, lower D-1 teams from neighboring or distant states. In such games, there tend to be minimal opposing fans traveling to CT, and lower interest/enthusiasm from UConn season ticket holders.

In my proposed scenario, it's plausible to imagine friends who cheer for different teams attending together, or in some cases, UConn ticket holders gifting their tickets to friends who root for other teams and would appreciate the generosity. It conceivably could result in stronger overall support for the state's lead program, based on goodwill generated by a greater sense of inclusion & fellowship among CT basketball fans.

Again, I wouldn't mind being walked through why and how my vision might be impractical, myopic, naive, etc. My intention is to be factually informed. I already imagine there must good reasons why this isn't done, but any helpful response offered with sincerity and/or kindness would be appreciated.

PS - I'm not extending the value to include Bryant or Holy Cross, as were suggested elsewhere, but I can see where other might be in favor of schools from adjacent states.
 
Last edited:
IIRC, Yale's coach has taken needless shots at UConn. You shouldn't do that to someone you want something from.
 
They say there’s no two people on earth exactly the same. No two faces, no two sets of fingerprints. But do they know that for sure? Cuz they would have to get everybody together in one huge space. And obviously that’s not possible even with computers. But not only that, they’d have to get all the people that ever lived, not just the ones now. So they got no proof. They got nothin.
I have 20 month old identical twins - they started with the same genes but they're def not exactly the same. They don't even look exactly the same.
 
They say there’s no two people on earth exactly the same. No two faces, no two sets of fingerprints. But do they know that for sure? Cuz they would have to get everybody together in one huge space. And obviously that’s not possible even with computers. But not only that, they’d have to get all the people that ever lived, not just the ones now. So they got no proof. They got nothin.
Yeah, but the approximate number of variations in the human genome is roughly 1 followed by 38 zeros. There would need to be basically one third of that number of humans born for a reasonable possibility of two with the same full genome to exist.

The math makes this basically impossible for another couple billion generations.
 
Yeah, but the approximate number of variations in the human genome is roughly 1 followed by 38 zeros. There would need to be basically one third of that number of humans born for a reasonable possibility of two with the same full genome to exist.

The math makes this basically impossible for another couple billion generations.
Math Nerd Alert!!!!!!
 
Yeah, but the approximate number of variations in the human genome is roughly 1 followed by 38 zeros. There would need to be basically one third of that number of humans born for a reasonable possibility of two with the same full genome to exist.
So you're saying there is a chance
 
.-.
Yeah, but the approximate number of variations in the human genome is roughly 1 followed by 38 zeros. There would need to be basically one third of that number of humans born for a reasonable possibility of two with the same full genome to exist.

The math makes this basically impossible for another couple billion generations.

How can anyone take this seriously when it completely ignores the role space aliens played in human development?
 
Pretty random team to schedule for the season opener. Hope they got a good guarantee for that cross country trip...
Screenshot_20230815-213251_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20230815-213251_Chrome.jpg
 
Tim Russo homecoming! That’s prob why. Gets his ring.
This. IMO, this is a classy move and not a happy coincidence.

NAU would have been more fun to play if Jalen Cone were still there, but could be a lot worse for a season opener.

The Big Sky is a consistently solid mid-major (ranked higher than MAC, SoCon, MAAC, America East, CAA and Patriot last season) and NAU made the Big Sky championship game last year.

Senior Carson Towt is their best returning player. Undersized 5 (6'7 235) and a double-double threat (five last season).
 
so that a couple million since Hurley's been here... hate to be cynical but that's an expense that doesnt need to be added to the $53 milly athletics deficit, especially when we're only getting ~$5 mill a year from the BE. can we find teams to beat up on early in the season that dont need a paycheck?
Sure there are. All you have to do is do a home and home. So give up a home game the next year. No one does road games only without a payout.
 
Haven't paid attention to scheduling this year but why the assumption UConn won't play Yale, and not the other way around.

It's not as simple as calling up Yale and saying "X date Y time, Z amount of money, Gampel."

Yale may not want the game this year as they want to build their resume, pad their wins to get a better seed if they win the Ivy, etc. Or they think they are good enough to warrant something they don't (return game, more money, different day/time, etc.)
It’s definitely us. Yale has been publicly complaining about it.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,258
Messages
4,560,157
Members
10,448
Latest member
MillerLitEd


Top Bottom