Very clever of you to not count season tickets, food and beverages, merch, parking and such.are you sure? two seasons ago the men only generated $755k in revenue for single-game tickets for the entire season. that's an average of $44k per home game and a buy game costs twice that on average. i'm not counting season ticket revenue but people arent buying those to see stonehill.
This. It wouldn’t kill us to have some of the buy games be against a mid-level A Ten team or a strong MAAC team.
I have a different view.
I think the quality of these Euro opponents is better than we think, and we are just that good.
I bet we win a good number of our Quad 1 games in humiliating blowouts.
Another thing you can waste too much time on is trying to decide which of identical twins looks the more alike.
Depends which one you're comparing them to.Another thing you can waste too much time on is trying to decide which of identical twins looks the more alike.
are you sure? two seasons ago the men only generated $755k in revenue for single-game tickets for the entire season. that's an average of $44k per home game and a buy game costs twice that on average. i'm not counting season ticket revenue but people arent buying those to see stonehill.
They say there’s no two people on earth exactly the same. No two faces, no two sets of fingerprints. But do they know that for sure? Cuz they would have to get everybody together in one huge space. And obviously that’s not possible even with computers. But not only that, they’d have to get all the people that ever lived, not just the ones now. So they got no proof. They got nothin.Actually I'm an optimist on that score. I've always thought it silly to believe that everyone now living is going to die when no one now living ever has.
You're going a little deeper than I dare to dig, but I subscribe 100% to your last two sentences.They say there’s no two people on earth exactly the same. No two faces, no two sets of fingerprints. But do they know that for sure? Cuz they would have to get everybody together in one huge space. And obviously that’s not possible even with computers. But not only that, they’d have to get all the people that ever lived, not just the ones now. So they got no proof. They got nothin.
i dont know i could only find ticket revenue but cheaper would mean better not worse opponents because they wouldnt be buy-games at allVery clever of you to not count season tickets, food and beverages, merch, parking and such.
What is the real number? I don't know. If they were losing money some bean counter would find even cheaper (worse) opponents.
Yeah, but remember, a lot of people get tripped up on this because it's different for boys than it is for girls.Another thing you can waste too much time on is trying to decide which of identical twins looks the more alike.
People thought it would be easier once computers weren't as big as rooms, because more people could fit into the space. But it didn't work out that way.They say there’s no two people on earth exactly the same. No two faces, no two sets of fingerprints. But do they know that for sure? Cuz they would have to get everybody together in one huge space. And obviously that’s not possible even with computers. But not only that, they’d have to get all the people that ever lived, not just the ones now. So they got no proof. They got nothin.
Haven't paid attention to scheduling this year but why the assumption UConn won't play Yale, and not the other way around.
It's not as simple as calling up Yale and saying "X date Y time, Z amount of money, Gampel."
Yale may not want the game this year as they want to build their resume, pad their wins to get a better seed if they win the Ivy, etc. Or they think they are good enough to warrant something they don't (return game, more money, different day/time, etc.)
I have 20 month old identical twins - they started with the same genes but they're def not exactly the same. They don't even look exactly the same.They say there’s no two people on earth exactly the same. No two faces, no two sets of fingerprints. But do they know that for sure? Cuz they would have to get everybody together in one huge space. And obviously that’s not possible even with computers. But not only that, they’d have to get all the people that ever lived, not just the ones now. So they got no proof. They got nothin.
Yeah, but the approximate number of variations in the human genome is roughly 1 followed by 38 zeros. There would need to be basically one third of that number of humans born for a reasonable possibility of two with the same full genome to exist.They say there’s no two people on earth exactly the same. No two faces, no two sets of fingerprints. But do they know that for sure? Cuz they would have to get everybody together in one huge space. And obviously that’s not possible even with computers. But not only that, they’d have to get all the people that ever lived, not just the ones now. So they got no proof. They got nothin.
Math Nerd Alert!!!!!!Yeah, but the approximate number of variations in the human genome is roughly 1 followed by 38 zeros. There would need to be basically one third of that number of humans born for a reasonable possibility of two with the same full genome to exist.
The math makes this basically impossible for another couple billion generations.
So you're saying there is a chanceYeah, but the approximate number of variations in the human genome is roughly 1 followed by 38 zeros. There would need to be basically one third of that number of humans born for a reasonable possibility of two with the same full genome to exist.
Yeah, but the approximate number of variations in the human genome is roughly 1 followed by 38 zeros. There would need to be basically one third of that number of humans born for a reasonable possibility of two with the same full genome to exist.
The math makes this basically impossible for another couple billion generations.
This. IMO, this is a classy move and not a happy coincidence.Tim Russo homecoming! That’s prob why. Gets his ring.
Sure there are. All you have to do is do a home and home. So give up a home game the next year. No one does road games only without a payout.so that a couple million since Hurley's been here... hate to be cynical but that's an expense that doesnt need to be added to the $53 milly athletics deficit, especially when we're only getting ~$5 mill a year from the BE. can we find teams to beat up on early in the season that dont need a paycheck?
It’s definitely us. Yale has been publicly complaining about it.Haven't paid attention to scheduling this year but why the assumption UConn won't play Yale, and not the other way around.
It's not as simple as calling up Yale and saying "X date Y time, Z amount of money, Gampel."
Yale may not want the game this year as they want to build their resume, pad their wins to get a better seed if they win the Ivy, etc. Or they think they are good enough to warrant something they don't (return game, more money, different day/time, etc.)