- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 5,745
- Reaction Score
- 16,699
It is probably like 20 minutes“How long until - ”
Hold your poop
Take a poop and check back in
Have you pooped today?
It is probably like 20 minutes“How long until - ”
Hold your poop
Take a poop and check back in
Have you pooped today?
You started drinking way too early, that's the floor.superjohn is touching the ceiling
“How long until - ”
Hold your poop
Take a poop and check back in
Have you pooped today?
Up until yesterday and were my favorite posts of all time.
Yesterday it was “it is”.
Today it is .
Just hold that poop inUp until yesterday and were my favorite posts of all time.
Yesterday it was “it is”.
Today it is .
In all depends.Just hold that poop in
You’re right! I didn’t even know this Twitter account existed.I’m a huge UConn fan and love when recruiting heats up but fans shouldn’t be texting players and definitely not tweeting about it. That’s a huge violation and one of these days the program will get in trouble for that. Don’t wanna be “that guy” but UConn compliance tweeted about it yesterday so we should calm down with the out reach a bit
You’re right! I didn’t even know this Twitter account existed.
I completely agree with you. I don’t think there should be rules like that. But there are, unfortunately. Fans messaging on twitter is one thing but outright texting kinda pushes the limit. A reporter asking about recruiting is fine. A fan pushing a player to commit to a school over text can be a step too far. The intentions aren’t wrong of course.I dont see how they can pretend to have any control over who fans talk or text with. Not like we're on payroll.
Every kids mentions on Twitter are flooded with fans requesting the kid play at their school. They have to know there's no reasonable way they can police DMs. Besides dont they have bigger issues to work out? Like maybe an FBI investigation into players being paid? I really don't wanna hear it.I completely agree with you. I don’t think there should be rules like that. But there are, unfortunately. Fans messaging on twitter is one thing but outright texting kinda pushes the limit. A reporter asking about recruiting is fine. A fan pushing a player to commit to a school over text can be a step too far. The intentions aren’t wrong of course. If you have season tickets that makes it even more dicier.
I’m saying social media is fine. Texting isn’t. Simple. Not trying to be a downer but UConn compliance didn’t just randomly tweet that.Every kids mentions on Twitter are flooded with fans requesting the kid play at their school. They have to know there's no reasonable way they can police DMs. Besides dont they have bigger issues to work out? Like maybe an FBI investigation into players being paid? I really don't wanna hear it.
I dont see how they can pretend to have any control over who fans talk or text with. Not like we're on payroll.
YesThat’s one of Chief’s strengths - evaluating raw, developing Bigs. An experienced eye test is more important than the box score at this point.
I don't think @4TheCycle1 is a donor. Obviously don't offer gifts in return for commitments, but they have no authority over fan DMs.Does UConn have any ability to stop you from reaching out? No. But can the NCAA punish UConn for a donor or season ticket holder reaching out on Twitter? Yes.
Whether or not the school has control (or "pretends" to) is irrelevant to the fact that boosters (which includes fans) aren't allowed to recruit.I dont see how they can pretend to have any control over who fans talk or text with. Not like we're on payroll.
I just find it funny the ncaa thinks it can tell normal fans what to do. Every player in the country would be ineligible if receiving fan dms was actually a problem, they know they're powerless against it.Whether or not the school has control (or "pretends" to) is irrelevant to the fact that boosters (which includes fans) aren't allowed to recruit.
Chill, if there is one thing we've learned over the past couple of weeks is that the staff has it covered.
Yes, but only UConn would get punished! Harshly.I just find it funny the ncaa thinks it can tell normal fans what to do. Every player in the country would be ineligible if receiving fan dms was actually a problem, they know they're powerless against it.
Imagine the NCAA explaining to Samson why he was suspended. They don't have the balls to enforce that rule.Yes, but only UConn would get punished! Harshly.
Yeah, you are misunderstanding it. They can’t do squat to you, but they can sanction the University because of your actions. Think that is far-fetched? Well, the woman’s basketball program once got a secondary violation because of a fan handed her a handmade poster.I just find it funny the ncaa thinks it can tell normal fans what to do. Every player in the country would be ineligible if receiving fan dms was actually a problem, they know they're powerless against it.