What a sad commentary on what is supposed to be an exceptional university!
Nah, they're too busy creating new academic standards that they can apply retroactively to schools like UConn who are the relatively new party crashers to the old hoops guard and making lots of noise in other sports.They sure seem to have sold their souls, and unlike previous scandals at other institutions refuse to admit it.
And I think the NCAA is proving it never had a soul by being so oblivious to what happened. The stark contrast between this case that so clearly involves massive academic fraud by an athletic department going back a very long time and affecting competitive balance with no consequences vs. all their other actions in recent history is amazing. If ever a school deserved the 'death penalty' and the voiding of records, this one does.
This is no time to muddy the water with facts!1) I can't agree there - Southern Methodist went after the death penalty with a vengeance and by God, they earned it. That was a truly impressive effort - you gotta admire a school that went on probation about a half-dozen times in a decade....and then ramped things up. That is the gold standard.
2) I sense UNC is trying to move the battle from one playing field to another. They're fighting over literacy rates right now - I'm much more interested in finding out how athletes accumulated approximately 2,100 enrollments in no-show classes.
Near as I can tell, if your athletes have enrolled in 2,100 classes that essentially didn't meet and effectively didn't exist, your reported APR is a work of fiction.
Only quibble - 'is a work of fiction' falls under the 'I misspoke' classification of prevarications. The more correct statement is:Near as I can tell, if your athletes have enrolled in 2,100 classes that essentially didn't meet and effectively didn't exist, your reported APR is a work of fiction.