No, not to each his own.
This is what you wrote:
I understand there are some informal, casual fans, apparently like yourself, who may not have more than a cursory interest in the actual game itself other than who won. That's 100% fine with me, UConn needs fans like you too. But, many on this board do have an actual interest in the game itself and how players contribute to the team. So this post is for them.
That simply does not describe RichZ. Like I said, he writes up detailed analyses of the games. So clearly, as a matter of objective fact, he has more than a cursory interest in the actual game itself other than who won, and actually has an interest in evaluating how the various players contribute to to the team.
You may not want to admit you accused the wrong poster of being a casual fan, but you did. Or are you a purveyor/consumer of alternative facts?