- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 13,362
- Reaction Score
- 33,634
The way they fired Jags too.
Edit: And how ironic that BC's AD just announced he's resigning this June.
What is their weird obsession with not wanting to publicly fire someone?
The way they fired Jags too.
Edit: And how ironic that BC's AD just announced he's resigning this June.
At the end of the day BC is Boston and Boston is the capital of New England. It's the largest TV market in the ACC. They have a horrible president in terms of athletics, but a stellar reputation academically. That carries a lot of weight with the ACC presidents.
These two points make BC a worthwhile investment for the ACC. With their network set to roll out in two years, I'm sure the ACC is already making mandates to BC in terms of facilities. I know that they are building an indoor football field this summer. Leahy will soon retire and their AD is out at the end of the academic year.
...................
I think Blauds should stop trolling message boards trying to generate clicks...
Not Blaud: Lights!Camera!Sports! with Mike Gualtieri
Fair enough. Rest of the statement on Blauds stands.
I mean if it were a quick fix, I think the ACC would swap UConn for BC's "stellar academic reputation" in a heartbeat, but that's not an option.On what planet does the ACC care about academics?
..and BC does nothing more than the already do for the New England market even with a pending conference network.
Not a troll, I just state the facts as I see them. I'm not going to sit around and get my hopes up for an invite that is never coming.
Duke, UVA, Wake, BC, GT, ND all care about academics. In addition Boston is the largest TV market in the ACC meaning the ACC is not giving up on BC.
I think it is complete nonsense that BC dictates anything to the ACC. FSU & Clemson carry the most weight and VT & Miami back them up. BC was the only school to vote against increasing the player stipends in the entire P5. BC simply carries no weight in the ACC or nationally. They are only in a P5 conference because of their location.
For UConn the choices are simple, wait around for an invite that is never coming or be a leader and build a national alliance of the best G5 programs in the country assuring the champion of a playoff spot. BYU and Boise St should already be involved in the discussion.
At the end of the day BC is Boston and Boston is the capital of New England. It's the largest TV market in the ACC. They have a horrible president in terms of athletics, but a stellar reputation academically. That carries a lot of weight with the ACC presidents.
These two points make BC a worthwhile investment for the ACC. With their network set to roll out in two years, I'm sure the ACC is already making mandates to BC in terms of facilities. I know that they are building an indoor football field this summer. Leahy will soon retire and their AD is out at the end of the academic year.
Our problem is that we are located too close to BC and our football program is worse. I don't think BC carries any decision making weight on keeping UConn out. SU and Pitt received strong objections from FSU and Clemson due to their poor football programs and a lack of interest from FSU & Clemson fans in watching those games. They want WVU or the pipe dream of Texas in addition to ND, not another Northeast team unless it is Penn St.
Our focus should be on winning the AAC and making it a viable conference. We have to assume that their will be 4 power conferences with 16 teams each and that we will not be part of it, but that does not mean we will be shut out of an expanded playoff spot for our conference champion. We're not alone, WAC, Mt West, C-USA, BYU are all in the same boat with us. There are deals and strategic alliances to be made to guarantee a playoff spot or two.
How can you say that the ACC doesn't care about academics? UNC cares so much that they cheated for 15 years with phony classes, plagiarized papers and committed other academic sins, and not just for football, but also for men' and women' basketball. They did it so well that they haven't been penalized! How's that for commitment to academics?On what planet does the ACC care about academics?
..and BC does nothing more than the already do for the New England market even with a pending conference network.
On what planet does the ACC care about academics?
..and BC does nothing more than the already do for the New England market even with a pending conference network.