8893
Curiouser
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 29,845
- Reaction Score
- 96,450
I think most people here understand that fully, and you are far more upset about being wrong than anyone else. I didn't even remember what you were wrong about and I am guessing that 99% of those here don't either, but I am sure you will never forget it, and you take every chance to project your anger about it on others.You are 100% correct. It is a guesstimation. Mack is a great example of that concept. I was told by a local reporter,2 national recruiting reporters, a top aau coach I am friendly with and a top uconn booster who is extremely close to the program that mack will pick uconn. All this happened in under 24 hours. So I post it on this board and as history tell things changed and from the sounds of it very quickly. so I have egg on my face. I had more sources then a NY times article but still ended up wrong. It is what it is ..always changing
For me, it's not being right or wrong about a particular recruit that sticks in my craw; it's the aspersions that you and others have repeatedly cast on our staff for what you apparently believe is their incompetence at recruiting. You concede that recruiting is unpredictable when trying to defend your own information that turned out to be wrong, but you are more than willing to hold the staff accountable for what you then term as their recruiting misses. I'm sure that there is some kernel of truth in all of this--and I think most here understand that there was a learning curve to be surmounted--but the knee-jerk reaction to blame the staff, combined with the deafening silence from that same contingent when we have recruiting successes, can be off-putting imo, and seems to reveal a bias that shades all the other information provided.