99 has called posters simpletons, asked if they eat lead at work, called people s, all the while single handedly having the biggest overreaction. To him thats perfectly fine.
But questioning whether saying "next" when anyone who does not follow recruiting one bit would be right 90% of the time for saying "next" to every recruit is apparently outrageous to bring up. Anyone here who follows recruiting would be able to correctly guess who is NOT coming nearly 100% of the time. With Zionn it is not about his accuracy, its about his tactic of being adamant with saying "next" as though its a fact and some inside secret and then being ambiguous about indications of who will be coming here.
No one has anything personal against Zionn. I love Zionn simply because he is a die hard UCONN fan and also he seems like a good guy by taking criticisms without overreacting like 99. I said this before and I'll say it again I just don't buy Zionn's "nexts" being informative, but he is a good guy (from what I can tell from his posts).
99 on the other hand has provided substantive recruiting insight, and I have said this before, of course he is not going to be accurate 100% of time, being right 50% is great if your providing info that others here dont have otherwise. But at the same time 99 right now is a certified .