- Joined
- Mar 30, 2012
- Messages
- 1,987
- Reaction Score
- 9,429
Let's all try to make intelligent comments so the Boneyard doesn't become a complete waste of time...
Let's all try to make intelligent comments so the Boneyard doesn't become a complete waste of time...
Our timing was way off. We were out of sync. Just the command wasn't there. You could see players running plays but we rarely seemed to be in the spot.That's all we did was "run the offense" last year, we didn't have a guy that can break someone down off the dribble which was a huge hole for us. Newton brings us that skill plus being able to "start an offense". This isn't 1980 we need guards that can take guys 1 on 1 and score at will.
It was a joke oh serious and humorless one. No worship needed…. Just offering a reasoned opinion in a often nutty place.Following the best season we have had in years and the announcement of the intended departure of a handful of players who clearly didn’t earn the confidence of the coaching staff to gain playing time, many of you decided that it was time to panic and reject your leader (Hurley). You decided you, with all of your division 1 coaching experience, and your daily interactions with the players, and your daily discussions with the assistant coaches (I’m being facetious here), knew more about what’s going on with the team than Hurley. “Fire him, something is terribly wrong with the culture, he’s a terrible recruiter.” I watched these posts for a week or so and was amazed at the grandiosity behind many of the wild opinions being shared. Did it ever occur to those of you who were certain that the sky was falling that you are a fan and that you don’t have 1/100 of the knowledge and the insight about coaching a D1 bball team as Hurley does? Why did you not assume the most likely scenario…. Hurley gave players honest feedback about where they stand and they decided to leave because they want playing time? You thought Hurley and his staff can’t evaluate talent correctly after a year with these players? Come on. You didn’t think Hurley knew he needed to get guards from the transfer portal??? Wow! I know the fun of the boneyard is to be an armchair quarterback but many of you went overboard after a wave splashed up over the bow . I’ve posted this to give some of you the chance to repent. .

You are guaranteeing a National Championship next year? Excellent.
While I appreciate the impromptu stylized nickname for Led Zeppelin, and I'll accept balloon as a valid description, if not synonym, of zeppelin, I cannot accept iron and a stand-in for "led". First, Theo Kattamis (famed UConn material science professor) would roll over in his grave (if he were dead) if he heard someone using iron and lead interchangeably. They are completely different elements with very different densities (the relevant property of the metal in the "lead balloon/zeppelin" metaphor). Secondly, even if iron were acceptable, you'd have to misspell it. I give you a D+.iron balloon disbanded in 1980, around the same time as you hung that weird smelling little xmas tree thing on the rearview mirror of ur chevy citation, almost a half century ago.
time to change it, and rescent ur hoopty. 'eau de mothball' prolly ur best bet.
Strongly disagree. What this is about is that many people here hate Hurley and go DEFCON 1 on a hiccup.There was not much hysteria at all until Floyd transferred. Which obviously doesn't make this about playing time.
This is a straw man argument, yet another logical fallacy. I read those same posts - in fact, I probably posted a couple of them - and very few showed "panic" or rejection of Hurley. The majority wondered how it could have been that the staff was so wrong in assessing the ability of 3 highly ranked and aggressively recruited guards that they felt, after those post-season discussions, that their best option was to transfer for playing time. We all are aware of the portal, and understand that you are more likely to find solid contributors if you are shopping in the 'already proven' aisle. But that doesn't explain why Floyd didn't play when it was clear that Gaffney and Diggins weren't trusted to contribute. It doesn't explain how the staff was unable to develop highly ranked guards like Gaffney and Diggins into productive college players. Unless, of course, they were completely off in their evaluations when recruiting them.Following the best season we have had in years and the announcement of the intended departure of a handful of players who clearly didn’t earn the confidence of the coaching staff to gain playing time, many of you decided that it was time to panic and reject your leader (Hurley).
While you're right that very few of us have Div. 1 coaching experience, or even playing Div. 1 ball, we have all played and watched and sometimes coached a lot of basketball. We know how teams work, how players and coaches interact, and we know talent when we see it. My questions on Hurley started when I saw him not playing Whaley, when what I saw was a quick and agile defender with high energy and court smarts. It took an injury for him to get his chance.You decided you, with all of your division 1 coaching experience, and your daily interactions with the players, and your daily discussions with the assistant coaches (I’m being facetious here), knew more about what’s going on with the team than Hurley.
I saw a couple of "fire him" posts. I took them to be hyperbole. Apparently you didn't. And I've said he's a much better recruiter than Ollie, obviously, but there are questions about guard evaluations that need to be answered. Castle will probably do that. But if you want to compete with the big boys you cant swing and miss often.“Fire him, something is terribly wrong with the culture, he’s a terrible recruiter.”
They are just opinions. Everyone has them. Some are right, some are wrong. Right or wrong are not often known immediately. Some are only proven right much later, as time and events reveal. It's best to have some humility about right or wrong until those events become determinative.I watched these posts for a week or so and was amazed at the grandiosity behind many of the wild opinions being shared.
There are very few chicken littles here. Virtually all of us want to see UConn in the running for national championnships every year, but when a team flames out in the first round 2 years in a row against lower ranked teams, you get concerned.Did it ever occur to those of you who were certain that the sky was falling that you are a fan and that you don’t have 1/100 of the knowledge and the insight about coaching a D1 bball team as Hurley does?
Well, maybe a few ...
Excellent point!The Transfer Portal age is changing how we see things. We’re all a work in progress. Every program in multiple sports is going through the same thing. We’re lucky we’re at the top of the food chain instead of some mid major that loses its stars every year. That would totally suck.
Very thoughtful post and criticism. I respect your thoughts and agree with some aspects of your criticism. The essence of my post is that laypersons too often base their opinions about the behavior of experts on minimal information and a lot of assumptions that fail to give the expert even the slightest benefit of the doubt. Hurley has flaws of course but he has also demonstrated considerable expertise. The boneyard is filled with opinions based on very little true understanding of the issues. This, in my opinion, is hard to argue. However, this does not mean that reasonable, fair, intelligent posters do not exist on the boneyard. Of course they do. I was speaking to those that jump to absolute truths from very little evidence. Yes, everyone is entitled to have their opinion and the debates are fun. Interjecting a reminder to temper our opinions with some degree of hubris… I thought was warranted in this situation. Some appear to agree and others not so much.This post needs a fisking, unfortunately.
This is a straw man argument, yet another logical fallacy. I read those same posts - in fact, I probably posted a couple of them - and very few showed "panic" or rejection of Hurley. The majority wondered how it could have been that the staff was so wrong in assessing the ability of 3 highly ranked and aggressively recruited guards that they felt, after those post-season discussions, that their best option was to transfer for playing time. We all are aware of the portal, and understand that you are more likely to find solid contributors if you are shopping in the 'already proven' aisle. But that doesn't explain why Floyd didn't play when it was clear that Gaffney and Diggins weren't trusted to contribute. It doesn't explain how the staff was unable to develop highly ranked guards like Gaffney and Diggins into productive college players. Unless, of course, they were completely off in their evaluations when recruiting them.
While you're right that very few of us have Div. 1 coaching experience, or even playing Div. 1 ball, we have all played and watched and sometimes coached a lot of basketball. We know how teams work, how players and coaches interact, and we know talent when we see it. My questions on Hurley started when I saw him not playing Whaley, when what I saw was a quick and agile defender with high energy and court smarts. It took an injury for him to get his chance.
I saw a couple of "fire him" posts. I took them to be hyperbole. Apparently you didn't. And I've said he's a much better recruiter than Ollie, obviously, but there are questions about guard evaluations that need to be answered. Castle will probably do that. But if you want to compete with the big boys you cant swing and miss often.
They are just opinions. Everyone has them. Some are right, some are wrong. Right or wrong are not often known immediately. Some are only proven right much later, as time and events reveal. It's best to have some humility about right or wrong until those events become determinative.
There are very few chicken littles here. Virtually all of us want to see UConn in the running for national championnships every year, but when a team flames out in the first round 2 years in a row against lower ranked teams, you get concerned.
Then you follow up with another straw man. You don't have to coach a D1 hoop team to know basketball. Having been on this board for a number of years, there are a lot of members with deep basketball knowledge. Yes, even if they haven't coached D1.

Overboard? You do realize what the outcome of the 1st round game was? Did you see Creighton's part 1 and 2? Must be nice to be that fan, that says, "it's ok we'll get 'em next year".I meant to put a laughing face emoji after the word “repent.” The tone of the post wasn’t meant to be harsh, just amazement and an invite to those who went overboard to laugh at themselves.
okeydokey, let's see if i got this correct.Very thoughtful post and criticism. I respect your thoughts and agree with some aspects of your criticism. The essence of my post is that laypersons too often base their opinions about the behavior of experts on minimal information and a lot of assumptions that fail to give the expert even the slightest benefit of the doubt. Hurley has flaws of course but he has also demonstrated considerable expertise. The boneyard is filled with opinions based on very little true understanding of the issues. This, in my opinion, is hard to argue. However, this does not mean that reasonable, fair, intelligent posters do not exist on the boneyard. Of course they do. I was speaking to those that jump to absolute truths from very little evidence. Yes, everyone is entitled to have their opinion and the debates are fun. Interjecting a reminder to temper our opinions with some degree of hubris… I thought was warranted in this situation. Some appear to agree and others not so much.![]()
And football folk who love to pile on basketball program any opportunity they seeStrongly disagree. What this is about is that many people here hate Hurley and go DEFCON 1 on a hiccup.
Overboard? You do realize what the outcome of the 1st round game was? Did you see Creighton's part 1 and 2? Must be nice to be that fan, that says, "it's ok we'll get 'em next year".
I should note, you presume there are those who have not coached at the D1 level and lack the experience. You know what they say about assuming.
the only thing in ur jibberjabber that is 100% correct is asking olehead for a 'wise alternative,' cuz olehead, along with very few others here, is truly wise in calling talent.and what is your wise alternative to the "go get em next year" crowd? We lost to Creighton twice and a first round tournament game, your solution is?
On the surface you seem like a spoiled POS.
Nice, and from our distant interaction you assume such, from my even evaluation of Dan Hurley over the last three years. I gave him the yung bull mulligan for sideline and strategy gaffes through 2020. And your inquiry Could be devalued as petulant ad hominem to be written off summarily, written off further fueled by your evident Fandom of that triple a L.I. Mets programand what is your wise alternative to the "go get em next year" crowd? We lost to Creighton twice and a first round tournament game, your solution is?
On the surface you seem like a spoiled POS.

An excellent, thoughtful response. Nice.Very thoughtful post and criticism. I respect your thoughts and agree with some aspects of your criticism. The essence of my post is that laypersons too often base their opinions about the behavior of experts on minimal information and a lot of assumptions that fail to give the expert even the slightest benefit of the doubt. Hurley has flaws of course but he has also demonstrated considerable expertise. The boneyard is filled with opinions based on very little true understanding of the issues. This, in my opinion, is hard to argue. However, this does not mean that reasonable, fair, intelligent posters do not exist on the boneyard. Of course they do. I was speaking to those that jump to absolute truths from very little evidence. Yes, everyone is entitled to have their opinion and the debates are fun. Interjecting a reminder to temper our opinions with some degree of hubris… I thought was warranted in this situation. Some appear to agree and others not so much.![]()
Relax. Back off your monster induced light roast.Oh wow, you have D1 coaching experience? please enlighten us. Should we fire our coach for losing to Creighton? How dare he.
Thanks for the insights. Yes, I do fully appreciate the thoughts of many on this sight and come here for the same reason you stated… to learn what’s going on with the team from the insiders’ perspectives and the more helpful posters who have more knowledge than I about history and/or current happenings. It’s the pointless bickering over speculation and opinions that are loosely related to facts as well as the unnecessary vitriol that’s hard to stomach at times. But such as the world of social media!An excellent, thoughtful response. Nice.
There’s a boatload of basketball knowledge and history collectively in the site members. That’s what makes it worth coming here. And (using politics only peripherally) as we’ve seen over the last, say, at least 22 years disagreement with a ‘current administration’ doesn’t mean you’re wrong.

Well done!!This post needs a fisking, unfortunately.
This is a straw man argument, yet another logical fallacy. I read those same posts - in fact, I probably posted a couple of them - and very few showed "panic" or rejection of Hurley. The majority wondered how it could have been that the staff was so wrong in assessing the ability of 3 highly ranked and aggressively recruited guards that they felt, after those post-season discussions, that their best option was to transfer for playing time. We all are aware of the portal, and understand that you are more likely to find solid contributors if you are shopping in the 'already proven' aisle. But that doesn't explain why Floyd didn't play when it was clear that Gaffney and Diggins weren't trusted to contribute. It doesn't explain how the staff was unable to develop highly ranked guards like Gaffney and Diggins into productive college players. Unless, of course, they were completely off in their evaluations when recruiting them.
While you're right that very few of us have Div. 1 coaching experience, or even playing Div. 1 ball, we have all played and watched and sometimes coached a lot of basketball. We know how teams work, how players and coaches interact, and we know talent when we see it. My questions on Hurley started when I saw him not playing Whaley, when what I saw was a quick and agile defender with high energy and court smarts. It took an injury for him to get his chance.
I saw a couple of "fire him" posts. I took them to be hyperbole. Apparently you didn't. And I've said he's a much better recruiter than Ollie, obviously, but there are questions about guard evaluations that need to be answered. Castle will probably do that. But if you want to compete with the big boys you cant swing and miss often.
They are just opinions. Everyone has them. Some are right, some are wrong. Right or wrong are not often known immediately. Some are only proven right much later, as time and events reveal. It's best to have some humility about right or wrong until those events become determinative.
There are very few chicken littles here. Virtually all of us want to see UConn in the running for national championnships every year, but when a team flames out in the first round 2 years in a row against lower ranked teams, you get concerned.
Then you follow up with another straw man. You don't have to coach a D1 hoop team to know basketball. Having been on this board for a number of years, there are a lot of members with deep basketball knowledge. Yes, even if they haven't coached D1.
What a bore...oy veyNice, and from our distant interaction you assume such, from my even evaluation of Dan Hurley over the last three years. I gave him the yung bull mulligan for sideline and strategy gaffes through 2020. And your inquiry Could be devalued as petulant ad hominem to be written off summarily, written off further fueled by your evident Fandom of that triple a L.I. Mets program![]()
Block me you dolt.What a bore...oy vey