- Joined
- Sep 30, 2011
- Messages
- 722
- Reaction Score
- 476
Per Major League... There's only one thing left to do... Win the whole @king thing
Whatever way this turns out its a total boning for UCONN. If he is somehow cleared and knowing how fast the NCAA moves it will be games not days, Boatright misses game time experience which will never be recovered which especially kills a young team that needs games playing together more than anything else. If he isn't cleared say goodbye to a player during the middle of a season at a position where UCONN is short of depth .
What a freaking mess.
Knowing the NCAA (or the whistle blower), I'm surprised they didn't sit on this and release it Selection Sunday.
I guess we will have to wait a bit longer for Napier to heal. Boatright should look into legal advice. Where are you BusinessLawyer??
UConn appears to be following the letter of the law per the NCAA with Boatright. He never would have played without their specific OK, so I don't see how any games could be at risk of forfeiture.Does anyone know what the rules are with this sort of thing in terms of vacating the season? Is the whole season vacated if he just played in 10 games?
The NCAA makes me sick, their contempt for Calhoun is unbelievable. They clear the kid now they sit him out again, you can't make this **** up. The NCAA will do everything in their power to keep us from repeating, the only good news is Calhoun is always at his best when he's backed into a corner. Us against the world.
The Wolf will save the day. It's Pulp Fiction time
Admit it. You forgot he was on the roster.
Wolfe, Bradley, Kyle Bailey.
This is getting very old. Every year we seem to be dealing with some sort of problem and frankly it is hard to blame the NCAA for this if new information regarding violations surfaced. They really don't have any choice but to investigate. The maddening part is having to deal with these problems on a fragmented basis. There is probably something to all this or we wouldn't be sitting Boatright.Uconn followed the procedure and sat Boatright the first time he was being reviewed. So if they actually do find something where hes ineligible then i dont think they can vacate a thing since he was cleared once already.
We create the fire and the NCAA simply follows the smoke.
If there is a problem I have no complaints about an investigation. But the way the NCAA handled the Ohio State players makes me question the even handedness of the NCAA. And maybe I'm a little cynical, but there are a lot of programs that make me think red flags should be raised and I don't see the scrutiny on them. It just seems odd.This is getting very old. Every year we seem to be dealing with some sort of problem and frankly it is hard to blame the NCAA for this if new information regarding violations surfaced. They really don't have any choice but to investigate. The maddening part is having to deal with these problems on a fragmented basis. There is probably something to all this or we wouldn't be sitting Boatright.
I'm not one who believes that the NCAA is out to get us. We create the fire and the NCAA simply follows the smoke.
Sitting Boatright against ND was Uconn's decision. I agree that the NCAA isn't consistant but that doesn't change the fact that we seem to have problems every year.Sometimes it is the program, sometimes it is current players and sometimes it is a recruit but there always seem to be something.If there is a problem I have no complaints about an investigation. But the way the NCAA handled the Ohio State players makes me question the even handedness of the NCAA. And maybe I'm a little cynical, but there are a lot of programs that make me think red flags should be raised and I don't see the scrutiny on them. It just seems odd.
The thing I don't understand is how did the Ohio State and Miami football players continue to play while the NCAA was investigating them for improper benefits received and RB not be allowed to play for benefits received? Maybe someone can explain the differences to me.
The thing I don't understand is how did the Ohio State and Miami football players continue to play while the NCAA was investigating them for improper benefits received and RB not be allowed to play for benefits received? Maybe someone can explain the differences to me.