I think it is, I didn't witness their first half fouls, but I didn't see much uproar about them being bad calls. I felt Okafor had to deal with a game that Brimah has had what, a dozen times this year? Sometimes, a guy can get 4 fouls in a half or a team can have 10 fouls to the other's 2, and its a well officiated game. Sometimes theres a logical difference based on how one team is defending and how the other is.
I think it is, I didn't witness their first half fouls, but I didn't see much uproar about them being bad calls. I felt Okafor had to deal with a game that Brimah has had what, a dozen times this year? Sometimes, a guy can get 4 fouls in a half or a team can have 10 fouls to the other's 2, and its a well officiated game. Sometimes theres a logical difference based on how one team is defending and how the other is.
I love this reactionBo was out coached, end of story.
Except that Winslow should have had to sit more. He very clearly committed two blatant charges in the second half after Okafor got his fourth, and then obviously he knocked a ball out of bounds that was somehow given back to Duke, and he stepped out of bounds with the ball and it wasn't called. These things put points on the board for Duke, and unquestionably changed the game. Yes, Duke was in foul trouble, but that doesn't mean that there weren't some egregious no-calls. Yes, Wisconsin had a big lead and should have held onto it, but that doesn't mean that the refs didn't give Duke free points that they probably don't win without.
There's also this little piece called coaching. Sure Puke had plenty of talent, but K is also light years ahead of Cal. If K had that UK team, no way it doesn't go undefeated. We were calling it all season, that eventually Cal's ineptitude would catch up with them.It's interesting that Kentucky, for all their wins, was done in the last two years by two teams led by juniors and seniors. But then Duke comes along and shows that sometimes talent really does trump everything.
Tough to blame the refs when Winslow and Okafor had to sit crucial minutes because of foul trouble.
If Kentucky was in the SEC with K yes, in any other P5, nobody coaches them to an unblemished recordThere's also this little piece called coaching. Sure Puke had plenty of talent, but K is also light years ahead of Cal. If K had that UK team, no way it doesn't go undefeated. We were calling it all season, that eventually Cal's ineptitude would catch up with them.
Haha, what?First: We watched CBS replay that ball going out of bounds about 8 times (probably more). I don't think I had any question that the kid Winslow touched it; I believed he ever-so-slightly changed the rotation. But, was it 100% certain? Those 3 refs watched it carefully. You can't say that didn't analyze correctly & came to a conclusion. I don't buy they story that Duke always gets that benefit of the 50/50.
Haha, what?
The only way you can conclude they made the right call is if all three officials are blind and/or don't have eyes.
I'm not getting into the discussion of whether or not the refs cost Wisco the game, but that decision (plus some of the calls in the Wisconsin-Kentucky game) was an inexplicable one. If we can't count on three officials - who supposedly are among the best in college - to get a relatively easy call right with replay, how can we expect them to make the right calls in real time?
Compared to similar situations, reversing the call was a relatively easy decision to make.See ... I don't think "easy" is the definition of that call. And, I think we are all biased by the CBS repeated showing & Raftery. It's less than certainty.
All Winslow does is foul.
Three-quarters of the comments here make me want to go, "You're right," irrespective of the degree to which many contradict each other.
Any way you parse it, Duke did last night what Kentucky could not do last year.
Put another way, Wisconsin could not hold the lead in ways that UConn did.
Yay.
When K called time out and summoned ref over for a private chat you mean.It looked like they relaxed after Okafor had to sit out in the 2nd half along with Winslow. They seemed to think they had the upper hand and allowed Allen to go off on them. Their defense on him was awful. He just drove to the hoop with hardly a challenge. the only time it seemed they did challenge him he just threw up a prayer and they called a foul. allen is the reason they lost that game. they were up 48-39 and K called the timeout and then Allen did his thing.
Well put. It's mind blowing that in the final and most important game of the year, the officiating could be so bad and during the most critical time, so one sided.Except that Winslow should have had to sit more. He very clearly committed two blatant charges in the second half after Okafor got his fourth, and then obviously he knocked a ball out of bounds that was somehow given back to Duke, and he stepped out of bounds with the ball and it wasn't called. These things put points on the board for Duke, and unquestionably changed the game. Yes, Duke was in foul trouble, but that doesn't mean that there weren't some egregious no-calls. Yes, Wisconsin had a big lead and should have held onto it, but that doesn't mean that the refs didn't give Duke free points that they probably don't win without.
...Exhibit A as to how people lose the ability to think rationally when it comes to Duke.