Blue Bloods and Elites | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Blue Bloods and Elites

I think you should include TX and maybe UNC in the historic category and drop MsSt from the latter as they really had a very short run..

I agree that blue blood is not a good term with some negative connotations.
Agree!

Wonder to what extent these levels of achievement are coach driven?

Does part of the conversation include sustainability over a long time span.

Where will Stanford and Connecticut programs be in 10 years? I'm reflecting on Tennessee post Summit is it possible Cards and Huskies follow that trajectory?
 
Why is it confusing? SC is the state of South Carolina abbreviation. It makes since to put that instead of writing South Carolina out. If you mail a letter and put "SC" on it, I doubt it will end up in Southern California.
Why is it confusing? Southern California has been called SC for at least two decades (College Football). I have never heard South Carolina being referred to as "SC" until about 3-4 years ago. Now if folks from South Carolina call it that, that is all well and good. To me, the OG of the SC is that team from Southern California. Now we use to call the WBB program of SC the Women of Troy. I guess it is okay to call them that since there was a recent documentary about the program. For a while, folks were saying that it was inappropriate to call them "Women of Troy". SMH
 
Why is it confusing? Southern California has been called SC for at least two decades (College Football). I have never heard South Carolina being referred to as "SC" until about 3-4 years ago. Now if folks from South Carolina call it that, that is all well and good. To me, the OG of the SC is that team from Southern California. Now we use to call the WBB program of SC the Women of Troy. I guess it is okay to call them that since there was a recent documentary about the program. For a while, folks were saying that it was inappropriate to call them "Women of Troy". SMH
So maybe they should stick with one name then. I have seen as of late USC is usually referred to the team out west and SC is used for South Carolina with speaking. I don't see how you give Southern Cal both monikers nationally.
 
Why is it confusing? Southern California has been called SC for at least two decades (College Football). I have never heard South Carolina being referred to as "SC" until about 3-4 years ago. Now if folks from South Carolina call it that, that is all well and good. To me, the OG of the SC is that team from Southern California. Now we use to call the WBB program of SC the Women of Troy. I guess it is okay to call them that since there was a recent documentary about the program. For a while, folks were saying that it was inappropriate to call them "Women of Troy". SMH
Type SC in your browser and see what comes up. Southern California "SoCal" and "USC" These are the monikers that they mostly are known for. Apologies for digressing.
 
Last edited:
.-.
Well the first one is tOSU, so it's down to the other two.

Pretty sure search engines return results based on the region you are in amongst other things.

I'm middle aged abd this topic is tedious to me. I can't think how exhausted I will be with this topic when I'm 70.

If you can't figure out what team is being referred to by the context you might be lacking in tge ability to reason.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
168,267
Messages
4,560,513
Members
10,452
Latest member
WashingtonH


Top Bottom