- Joined
- Nov 2, 2013
- Messages
- 50
- Reaction Score
- 174
Curtis Kelly leaving UConn
Curtis Kelly leaving UConn
I do think if we didn't finish the comeback against Duke that the -18 or whatever it was we had with Emeka on the bench would be a more painful pill than Caron sitting. We rolled the dice a bit that we'd have enough time to regroup. If Williams doesn't foul out it might have been a case of the strategy failing.
The fact that Emeka was the lone big standing showed that JC correctly gauged how the game would be called.
However, it still took a bit of luck on our part that we ended up on the right side of the final score. If Rashad misses that 3 with 2:40 to go, down 8, we probably run out of time for a comeback, and JC is rightfully criticized for not gambling when the game was clearly turning against us in the first half.
It's not luck when a guy who makes big shots makes a big shot. If Thabeet (or, say, Roy Hibbert) had hit a wing three down the stretch of a final four game, fine, you can call it luck, but not a guy who made his name making shots.
I think he left Greg Economou in too long vs GTown his 2nd year at the helm……….
The honeymoon was over after one season, huh MA?
It's not luck when a guy who makes big shots makes a big shot. If Thabeet (or, say, Roy Hibbert) had hit a wing three down the stretch of a final four game, fine, you can call it luck, but not a guy who made his name making shots.
Taliek pushing the ball off a rebound and finding Rashad wide open in the corner off of transition isn't luck, its called good basketball
It was a tremendous play, and the shot itself certainly wasn't "luck".
I'm simply illustrating how little had to go differently for the story to go from "JC was a genius" to "JC was an idiot".
Boone and Armstrong were so awful against George Mason that I think that not only Adrien, but even Nelson should have also gotten more minutes, if for no other reason than to light a fire under Boone and Armstrong. Calhoun was pretty hot at Boone the whole game, but Armstrong played 37 minutes and basically got a pass.
In 2009 we finally got AJ Price to the Final Four but Dyson was out. Our guards for that game were AJ , Craig Austrie and a young Kemba. That team was supposed to have Doug Wiggins on it and as I recall he was no " Scrub". He would of made a difference.
Wiggins was a piece of and wouldn't have made a difference.
What would have made a difference is if Kemba had had an average game, rather than one of the worst performances in a Tournament game in program history (1-5 from the field, 3-9 from the line, 4 turnovers). If he had been able to take even a little pressure off of AJ, both of them would have had better games and we would have won.
One of the under-heralded storylines of our 2011 run was the Kemba Redemption Tour, getting back to the Final Four, performing well, and winning.
Or maybe, the #1 team in the country was just, you know, better than the freshman versions of Rip, Jake, and KFree, especially with King and Moore out of the game.I think it was against #1 Kansas when Moore and King were kept out by NCAA. I believe we had a 21 point lead and blew it after half time trying to protect the lead.
Tenspro2002 said:Wiggins was a piece of and wouldn't have made a difference. What would have made a difference is if Kemba had had an average game, rather than one of the worst performances in a Tournament game in program history (1-5 from the field, 3-9 from the line, 4 turnovers). If he had been able to take even a little pressure off of AJ, both of them would have had better games and we would have won. One of the under-heralded storylines of our 2011 run was the Kemba Redemption Tour, getting back to the Final Four, performing well, and winning.
The way we were playing that tournament (wasn't just one game), I don't think we beat Florida that year.
I also think sitting Caron with 2 fouls was a mistake against Maryland, and it was almost a mistake to sit Emeka with 2 fouls against dook. Caron only ended up with 3 fouls, and Emeka was a smart enough player to know how to keep himself from fouling out..
Right. JC "couldn't get over the FF hump" in 1994. When his team had been to the final eight one time, in their first NCAA appearance. There was no "FF hump" to speak of, at least until after the 1994 loss, but moreso after the loss in the final eight in 1995. The very idea that Calhoun went against his own tendencies is pretty laughable, but to claim he did so because he "couldn't get over the FF hump" in 1994 is just unfathomably ridiculous.I think regular season. if the team is playing like they did with FL and GM, JC sits all the starters and plays the bench. Because it was the tournament and we could not get over the FF hump he backed off his regular tendency.