Big Ten Conference Season Tip -off. Who's #1? | Page 8 | The Boneyard

Big Ten Conference Season Tip -off. Who's #1?

Ohio State is a great team to be sure. I didn't watch their game vs Nebraska last night, but I did look at the box score: Nebraska had 30 turnovers! I'm guessing the Buckeyes were pressing; in their game against Iowa they took it off because it was ineffective. I wouldn't be surprised to see them beat Iowa in Iowa City that last game of the season, but I'm not looking for any kind of easy win.
Ohio State has been impressive since their loss to Michigan. I was surprised that Michigan won that game. Yep. Ohio State was pressing. It is going to be interesting see the final few games of the Big Ten regular season.
 
Ohio State controls its own destiny for a share of the Big Ten, which is a good thing because there are few situations I’d want to be in less than playing Iowa on the road, in the final regular season game of Clark’s career, with a conference title on the line.
 
Ohio State controls its own destiny for a share of the Big Ten, which is a good thing because there are few situations I’d want to be in less than playing Iowa on the road, in the final regular season game of Clark’s career, with a conference title on the line.
Ohio State and Stanford might be the best teams in their leagues, but the league offices in both cases gave them the easier path to the conference championship. OSU playing IU only once, at home, is a huge break vis-a-vis both Iowa, who plays IU and OSU twice, and IU, who had to go to Columbus. And Stanford, getting single plays with the currently 3rd-6th teams in the league, Colorado, USC, UCLA, & Utah, and double plays with teams 7-12, is a real break as well.
 
Ohio State and Stanford might be the best teams in their leagues, but the league offices in both cases gave them the easier path to the conference championship. OSU playing IU only once, at home, is a huge break vis-a-vis both Iowa, who plays IU and OSU twice, and IU, who had to go to Columbus. And Stanford, getting single plays with the currently 3rd-6th teams in the league, Colorado, USC, UCLA, & Utah, and double plays with teams 7-12, is a real break as well.
Oh, so it’s not just an SEC conspiracy?

My Lawd, it’s HUGE!
 
Ohio State and Stanford might be the best teams in their leagues, but the league offices in both cases gave them the easier path to the conference championship. OSU playing IU only once, at home, is a huge break vis-a-vis both Iowa, who plays IU and OSU twice, and IU, who had to go to Columbus. And Stanford, getting single plays with the currently 3rd-6th teams in the league, Colorado, USC, UCLA, & Utah, and double plays with teams 7-12, is a real break as well.
I could be wrong, since I have not gone back to check on the schedules over the past few years, but I would be surprised if Stanford was given a "walk in the park" to the Pac-12 tournament over the past 5 years. If its path was favorable this year, perhaps that was just the "luck of the draw" this year. Feel free to rebut with the schedules from the recent seasons, since I did not go back to check and am relying on general impression, versus actual statistics.
 
Ohio State and Stanford might be the best teams in their leagues, but the league offices in both cases gave them the easier path to the conference championship. OSU playing IU only once, at home, is a huge break vis-a-vis both Iowa, who plays IU and OSU twice, and IU, who had to go to Columbus. And Stanford, getting single plays with the currently 3rd-6th teams in the league, Colorado, USC, UCLA, & Utah, and double plays with teams 7-12, is a real break as well.
Re Ohio State, that was a big head scratcher to me. Had assumed it was a given considering how both teams performed last season.
 
.-.
Re Ohio State, that was a big head scratcher to me. Had assumed it was a given considering how both teams performed last season.
The BIG schedule makers predicted a top tier of OSU, Iowa, IU and Maryland, rather than a top tier of OSU, Iowa, & IU. With a 4-team top tier, you play 5 games (2 double plays, 1 single play) against the other top tier members. With a 3-team top tier, you would play double plays against both of the other top tier members. It wasn't bias to predict a top tier with Maryland in it, but it was a reasonably foreseeable (not obvious) bad prediction. A lot of BIG fans were predicting pre-season that this was finally the year Maryland was not elite, by BIG standards.
 
The BIG schedule makers predicted a top tier of OSU, Iowa, IU and Maryland, rather than a top tier of OSU, Iowa, & IU. With a 4-team top tier, you play 5 games (2 double plays, 1 single play) against the other top tier members. With a 3-team top tier, you would play double plays against both of the other top tier members. It wasn't bias to predict a top tier with Maryland in it, but it was a reasonably foreseeable (not obvious) bad prediction. A lot of BIG fans were predicting pre-season that this was finally the year Maryland was not elite, by BIG standards.
I get that, but considering how these teams battled last season, having a home and home between OSU and Indiana seemed like a better match up for viewing to me.
 
Michigan State grinds out a win and gets the in-state rivalry sweep today.

Maryland beats Penn State by 15. Have they righted the ship to try to keep themselves in consideration for the tournament?

In contrast, Penn State has now lost 5 in a row, after being on 6 game winning streak. What's happened? I know they lost a player for the season, but with everyone else on the roster, I thought they would figure things out.
 
Michigan State grinds out a win and gets the in-state rivalry sweep today.

Maryland beats Penn State by 15. Have they righted the ship to try to keep themselves in consideration for the tournament?

In contrast, Penn State has now lost 5 in a row, after being on 6 game winning streak. What's happened? I know they lost a player for the season, but with everyone else on the roster, I thought they would figure things out.
If the Terps win the Rutgers and Wisconsin games at home, they're in the tournament. Currently their SOS is 3rd in the country.

PSU has an issue with turnovers. They commit way too many. But their personnel is solid.
 
If the Terps win the Rutgers and Wisconsin games at home, they're in the tournament. Currently their SOS is 3rd in the country.

PSU has an issue with turnovers. They commit way too many. But their personnel is solid.
Very surprised by that. Would not have thought PSU was that turnover prone.
 
Ohio State controls its own destiny for a share of the Big Ten, which is a good thing because there are few situations I’d want to be in less than playing Iowa on the road, in the final regular season game of Clark’s career, with a conference title on the line.
Pretty much. Ohio controls their destiny. Four games left between Ohio State, Iowa, and Indiana, who just happens to be in the mix. But I agree, Ohio State controls their destiny.
 
.-.
Uh oh Indiana. I've never really bought into this team all year. Do they have a signature win? Tennessee...nah. Princeton? They are 4-0 against Michigan, Michigan St., Nebraska and Maryland, but they've lost all the really big games on their schedule.

If this holds it will help Illinois a lot more than it hurts Indiana, but I wonder about their seeding for the NCAA Tourney. Despite the record, I'm not really sure they've earned a top 4 seed.
 
Uh oh Indiana. I've never really bought into this team all year. Do they have a signature win? Tennessee...nah. Princeton? They are 4-0 against Michigan, Michigan St., Nebraska and Maryland, but they've lost all the really big games on their schedule.

If this holds it will help Illinois a lot more than it hurts Indiana, but I wonder about their seeding for the NCAA Tourney. Despite the record, I'm not really sure they've earned a top 4 seed.
The score held up! Does this mean the jinx streak is over??!!?? :eek:
 
The score held up! Does this mean the jinx streak is over??!!?? :eek:
That would be monumental!

Probably need more than one outcome to prove the jinx is broken though.
 
That would be monumental!

Probably need more than one outcome to prove the jinx is broken though.
Well we have data that your predictions don't always correlate into a jinx now. Let's see what happens for the balance of the season ;)
 
Illinois blew the doors off Indiana. Huge win for Illinois. Illinois joins Michigan & Penn State for that middle pack in the Big Ten. Not sure if they get into the NCAA tournament but the WNIT looks promising.
 
After many games out of the line-up, I noticed Sydney Parrish got some court time in Illinois.
She was playing awfully well in the beginning of the season and IU isn't quite the same without her verve.

Does anyone know why she was out? Injury? Illness?

If she can round into shape, that would be helpful. It's hard to replace a player who was as steady and clutch as Grace Berger but I thought Parrish, Moore-McNeil and Scalia -- together -- were taking over aspects of Berger's game. It's a tip of the hat to Berger that removing one -- Parrish -- could take the Hoosiers down a few notches.

On the other hand, where has this Illini team been, well, all year?
 
.-.
After many games out of the line-up, I noticed Sydney Parrish got some court time in Illinois.
She was playing awfully well in the beginning of the season and IU isn't quite the same without her verve.

Does anyone know why she was out? Injury? Illness?

If she can round into shape, that would be helpful. It's hard to replace a player who was as steady and clutch as Grace Berger but I thought Parrish, Moore-McNeil and Scalia -- together -- were taking over aspects of Berger's game. It's a tip of the hat to Berger that removing one -- Parrish -- could take the Hoosiers down a few notches.

On the other hand, where has this Illini team been, well, all year?
They didn't explicitly say what, but she was out with a foot injury [wore a boot for a bit] that happened during a practice. She wasn't playing when I tuned into the game yesterday but I saw her face was red, so I'm sure she worked hard and was just on minutes limit.
 
Last edited:
They didn't explicitly say what, but she was out with a foot injury [wore a boot for a bit] that happened during a practice. She wasn't playing when I tuned into the game yesterday but I saw her face was red, so I'm sure she worked hard and was just on minutes limit.
Per the box score, she played 6 minutes which makes sense. Ease her back versus pushing too hard, especially considering it's a foot injury.
 
After many games out of the line-up, I noticed Sydney Parrish got some court time in Illinois.
She was playing awfully well in the beginning of the season and IU isn't quite the same without her verve.

Does anyone know why she was out? Injury? Illness?

If she can round into shape, that would be helpful. It's hard to replace a player who was as steady and clutch as Grace Berger but I thought Parrish, Moore-McNeil and Scalia -- together -- were taking over aspects of Berger's game. It's a tip of the hat to Berger that removing one -- Parrish -- could take the Hoosiers down a few notches.

On the other hand, where has this Illini team been, well, all year?
Re Illinois, no clue. Could it be like the groundhog coming out in February seeing tourney time is around the corner? :rolleyes:
 
Re Illinois, no clue. Could it be like the groundhog coming out in February seeing tourney time is around the corner? :rolleyes:
Jada Peebles went out with a knee injury, which I missed among all the other injuries in WCBB. That probably threw them off, given that Makira Cook was coming back off an injury herself. Gretchen Dolan, for a frosh, has stepped up as a sub and Camille Hobby and Kendall Bostic (how did MSU let her go?) have done good work together. Maybe, as you and the Groundhog might say, they could make a run in the latter part of the season.
 
With the way this season has been going, could Penn State and Maryland make things interesting for Ohio State? Penn State is up first. Penn State is on a 5-game losing streak, but anything is possible.
 
With the way this season has been going, could Penn State and Maryland make things interesting for Ohio State? Penn State is up first. Penn State is on a 5-game losing streak, but anything is possible.
The Valladay injury was huge for PSU. Valladay had played great in conference play. They have been poor since she went out.
 
.-.
The Valladay injury was huge for PSU. Valladay had played great in conference play. They have been poor since she went out.
Good intel, thanks. Is she out for the year?
Shame because, as you said, she'd been great: better than I'd seen her at either Marquette or Virginia. Third time appeared to be the charm. Hope she's able to come back in her last year of collegiate eligibility.
 
Good intel, thanks. Is she out for the year?
Shame because, as you said, she'd been great: better than I'd seen her at either Marquette or Virginia. Third time appeared to be the charm. Hope she's able to come back in her last year of collegiate eligibility.
Yes she is unfortunately. No insight on her eligibility however.
 
Watching Minnesota vs Wisconsin yesterday, I was happy for Coach Moseley, for obvious reasons, but felt bad for Minnesota. Wisconsin, never considered a really quick team, looked faster than Minnesota on everything! There was one possession where there was a rebound and two Minnesota players were close to the ball but they paused and let a Wisconsin player swoop in for the rebound. Coach Plitzuweit will definitely build on this season. We got the players here in Minnesota. Just have to figure it all out.
 
Watching Minnesota vs Wisconsin yesterday, I was happy for Coach Moseley, for obvious reasons, but felt bad for Minnesota. Wisconsin, never considered a really quick team, looked faster than Minnesota on everything! There was one possession where there was a rebound and two Minnesota players were close to the ball but they paused and let a Wisconsin player swoop in for the rebound. Coach Plitzuweit will definitely build on this season. We got the players here in Minnesota. Just have to figure it all out.
Losing Braun really hurt their momentum. Based on how things were going, Gopher fans should be excited about the future potential of this program.
 
Losing Braun really hurt their momentum. Based on how things were going, Gopher fans should be excited about the future potential of this program.
Braun is still due to back this season I read, unless this has changed?
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,220
Messages
4,557,744
Members
10,442
Latest member
StatsMan


Top Bottom