- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 29,430
- Reaction Score
- 46,999
Oh yeah?Check the SNY page RU v UConn for followers!!What does it say?
link or it doesn't exist.
Oh yeah?Check the SNY page RU v UConn for followers!!What does it say?
link or it doesn't exist.
link or it doesn't exist.
No one watches any of it. That much is proven. Compare SNY's football for Rutgers and UConn to SNY's ratings for bball Just do it.
No one watches any of it. That much is proven. Compare SNY's football for Rutgers and UConn to SNY's ratings for bball Just do it.
If you need the SNY link your not a fan!!
WBB? No doubt UConn FB?not watched!That's a dumb thing to say.
And a dumb way to say it.
Link to this metric of so-called followers (no doubt bogus).
Here's what I'm looking at:
UConn men's bball averages 5 rating in its DMA, women's bball a 5 rating average. Both get up to 8.5 top rating in big games (this isn't SNY but all channels).
Rutgers fball averages 1.0 football in its DMA. Men's and women's bball is off the map.
Rutgers DMA is 7m people, while UConn's is 1.3m. I couldn't find reverse numbers to make the comparison (i.e. couldn't find UConn in NYC and Rutgers in Ct.) I bet UConn's are higher in NYC than Rutgers' in Ct.
Regardless, when you add all bball and football together, UConn makes out.
This is why licensing and tier 3 rights yield $24.8m for UConn in revenue while Rutgers only makes $10m.
That's a dumb thing to say.
And a dumb way to say it.
Link to this metric of so-called followers (no doubt bogus).
Here's what I'm looking at:
UConn men's bball averages 5 rating in its DMA, women's bball a 5 rating average. Both get up to 8.5 top rating in big games (this isn't SNY but all channels).
Rutgers fball averages 1.0 football in its DMA. Men's and women's bball is off the map.
Rutgers DMA is 7m people, while UConn's is 1.3m. I couldn't find reverse numbers to make the comparison (i.e. couldn't find UConn in NYC and Rutgers in Ct.) I bet UConn's are higher in NYC than Rutgers' in Ct.
Regardless, when you add all bball and football together, UConn makes out.
This is why licensing and tier 3 rights yield $24.8m for UConn in revenue while Rutgers only makes $10m.
That's a dumb thing to say.
And a dumb way to say it.
Link to this metric of so-called followers (no doubt bogus).
Here's what I'm looking at:
UConn men's bball averages 5 rating in its DMA, women's bball a 5 rating average. Both get up to 8.5 top rating in big games (this isn't SNY but all channels).
Rutgers fball averages 1.0 football in its DMA. Men's and women's bball is off the map.
Rutgers DMA is 7m people, while UConn's is 1.3m. I couldn't find reverse numbers to make the comparison (i.e. couldn't find UConn in NYC and Rutgers in Ct.) I bet UConn's are higher in NYC than Rutgers' in Ct.
Regardless, when you add all bball and football together, UConn makes out.
This is why licensing and tier 3 rights yield $24.8m for UConn in revenue while Rutgers only makes $10m.
Its unreal that you guys tout SNY in every post but can't find it on its own web page?Matt Sugran has a page and following for all the "local" teams!RU,SU and "UConn"!Or did he take it off for lack of interest?
I live in Cos Cob and the Capitol District in NY and I'm amazed at the block R's I see...its spreading!!It's in the very air!It's growing even as we BS ourselves now!!
Don't you get SNY alerts from Matt for all news UConn like all good RU,SU and UConn fans?The UConn following is so small they don't even advertise proudly the followers....RU has over 700 who want news INSTANTLY thru there station!DIEHARDS only!!My goodness you can't google SNY Matt Sugran?The links to all the schools they cover are there!
From a bottom line perspective, revenues from donations is no different from licensed goods so I don't agree with invalidity of the breakout.
That said, licensing may be the better metric for general fan base size but it's harder to make sure that you're completely comparing the same thing since a)Certain schools are locked into older deals despite licensing value for college sports having increased dramatically over the past decade and b)different schools offer different licensing rights.
For example, Rutger's last deal was made with Nelligan Sports Marketing back in 2003(and recently terminated) while UConn's was with IMG in 2008.
My guess is that UConn would probably generate more licensing sales than Rutgers even after the new deal is brokered but it'll probably be a lot closer than the current ~$10M gap.
Here - just so that everyone's using the same data. This is from the Department of Education data that the USA Today database is based out of but also breaks out the two big revenue sports.
As expected UConn makes more money than Rutgers ...
Rutgers Revenues for 2011-2012Total Revenues Men's and Women's Teams: $43,036,420Not Allocated by Gender/Sport: $14,443,884GRAND TOTAL: $57,480,304UConn Revenues for 2011-2012Total Revenues Men's and Women's Teams: $26,699,993Not Allocated by Gender/Sport: $37,128,631GRAND TOTAL: $ 63,828,624
Fixed it for you.
UConn allocates some money to "non allocated" that Rutgers allocates to teams. But the grand total numbers should be independent of accounting methods.
Fixed it for you.
UConn allocates some money to "non allocated" that Rutgers allocates to teams. But the grand total numbers should be independent of accounting methods.
I only posted those numbers because upstater was drawing a comparison between Rutgers FB and UConn BB, which is not a like for like comparison, especially with different DMAs.