It's always been the case, there has just always been a subsection of fans that believed it wasn't the case.
When we got dinged for failing the academic compliance requirement this forum had a lot of posters blaming JC and the UConn athletic academic support system.
There were nine other schools including Cal Poly that were sanctioned. We were the only bb powerhouse however.
Those angry posters joining in the blame game were mostly intelligent rules based individuals that valued education.
Yet as intelligent as most were they could not place any value to the fact that universities were self reporting the grades of their athletes and ignored those of us that recommended they give that point some consideration. I wonder if they were shocked when the situation at UNC was revealed.
Kentucky got rid of Tubby Smith even though he won an NC because he failed to get top recruits. The squid gets hired and year after year gets the best recruits starting before he had success. Yet in spite of his NC at UMass being vacated for cheating and what happened to Tubby a majority of posters argued Calipari’s recruiting success was because of the Kentucky brand.
A booster was caught handing out upwards of fifty thousand dollars to visiting recruits at Arizona. The FBI gave evidence of money being given to recruits at multiple institutions.
A division 3 women’s field hockey coach gets fired because she paid recruits to come to her program.
Cheating has been going on well before the Chicago Black Sox scandal. Part of our species success is the ability to figure out ways to do things easier and better. Cheating fits that criteria. Fan’s desire for success, coaches need to supply that need, universities need to keep wealthy alumni happy are the perfect formula for cheating.
The only thing NIL has changed is it allows those individuals who support following rules to get involved in providing money to athletes. As a consequence cheaters now have more competition. And this means they will have to pay more than previously. NIL hurts cheaters. Cheating programs are likely to suffer in the long run.