Big East Games Thread - Feb 25 | Page 12 | The Boneyard

Big East Games Thread - Feb 25

Joined
May 27, 2014
Messages
3,446
Reaction Score
17,641
Would you say the same thing about UConn? Lost to Xavier and Nova.!
Not exactly apples to apples. We were without Liam. And we’re paying for those losses now. No shot at a Big East regular season crown and our seed line will suffer.
 
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
51,108
Reaction Score
182,529
Would you say the same thing about UConn? Lost to Xavier and Nova.!
No. We're not fighting for our lives to make the tournament.

We never should've lost to Nova. We played poorly, no McNeeley, and AK choked.

Xavier basically needed to run the table for the rest of the regular season and couldn't even beat Nova.
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
2,607
Reaction Score
5,244
No. We're not fighting for our lives to make the tournament.

We never should've lost to Nova. We played poorly, no McNeeley, and AK choked.

Xavier basically needed to run the table for the rest of the regular season and couldn't even beat Nova.
Are you sure about that? Struggled to beat DePaul and Butler at home. Lost at home to St John's. Marquette win may be downgraded if they continue their downward spiral Three losses in Maui at full strength. and more losses likely to come. Can easily end up on the bubble. Even the game at PC will be a challenge.
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
2,607
Reaction Score
5,244
Not exactly apples to apples. We were without Liam. And we’re paying for those losses now. No shot at a Big East regular season crown and our seed line will suffer.
Another unexpected loss and early exit from the BE tourney will put us on the bubble. Especially given the benefit the power conferences receive.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
13,413
Reaction Score
72,806
UConn is 42nd in NET WAB. The next teams are Texas, SDSU, Arkansas, SMU, UNC, Gonzaga. Those teams are 10, 11, out, out, out, 9 seed in Bracket Matrix.

Also 45th in KPI. 39th in SOR. Those are the 3 resume metrics on the team sheet.

We're getting pretty bubbly, but we're on the right side for now. If we get killed by Creighton on Tuesday, we'll be firmly on bubble. Further losses outside of at St. John's will be trouble.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
2,644
Reaction Score
10,289
UConn is 42nd in NET WAB. The next teams are Texas, SDSU, Arkansas, SMU, UNC, Gonzaga. Those teams are 10, 11, out, out, out, 9 seed in Bracket Matrix.

Also 45th in KPI. 39th in SOR. Those are the 3 resume metrics on the team sheet.

We're getting pretty bubbly, but we're on the right side for now. If we get killed by Creighton on Tuesday, we'll be firmly on bubble. Further losses outside of at St. John's will be trouble.
The game at PC is always their SB. They’d love nothing more than to put us on the bubble.
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
45,028
Reaction Score
35,573
UConn is 42nd in NET WAB. The next teams are Texas, SDSU, Arkansas, SMU, UNC, Gonzaga. Those teams are 10, 11, out, out, out, 9 seed in Bracket Matrix.

Also 45th in KPI. 39th in SOR. Those are the 3 resume metrics on the team sheet.

We're getting pretty bubbly, but we're on the right side for now. If we get killed by Creighton on Tuesday, we'll be firmly on bubble. Further losses outside of at St. John's will be trouble.

UConn is actually getting some help from the Top 3 conferences. The Big 12 has seven teams within 2 games of .500, but Utah, Kansas State, and TCU have no shot at a bid and WVU is in bubble territory. The SEC only has four teams in that situation, and Vanderbilt's remaining schedule is really tough. It is hard to see a path where Vanderbilt, Texas, Georgia, Arkansas and Oklahoma all make it, because they all have must wins against each other. The Big 10 only has three teams within 2 games of .500, and two of them, Ohio State and USC, are in big trouble in terms of their bubble profile and remaining schedule. Oregon is 5-8 in conference, but has a pretty manageable remaining schedule so will probably be safe by Selection Sunday.

The ACC bubble teams are starting to perform as expected given their brutal performance in their non-conference schedule. Wins don't help and losses really hurt. SMU has a lousy NET of 40 despite being 18-5. Pitt needs 21 or 22 wins to even get in the discussion for an at-large.

The MWC has four bubbly teams (New Mexico, Utah State, Boise State and SDSU), but they all have a lot of games against each other left and none of them have much margin of error. I would expect one or two to play themselves all the way off the bubble.

My Predictions of total bids by league:

SEC: 12 (11 at-large)
Big 10: 9 (8 at-large)
Big 12: 8 (7 at-large)
Big East: 4 (3 at-large)
ACC: 4 (3 at-large)
MWC: 2 (1 at-large)
WCC: 2 (1 at-large)

34 at-large teams for 36 bids. There is still some cushion in that for upsets or some random team going on a tear. It is also as likely that a team will fall off a cliff as go on a tear, so some of those assumed at-large bids will get swapped as intra-conference games are decided.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
2,644
Reaction Score
10,289
UConn is actually getting some help from the Top 3 conferences. The Big 12 has seven teams within 2 games of .500, but Utah, Kansas State, and TCU have no shot at a bid and WVU is in bubble territory. The SEC only has four teams in that situation, and Vanderbilt's remaining schedule is really tough. It is hard to see a path where Vanderbilt, Texas, Georgia, Arkansas and Oklahoma all make it, because they all have must wins against each other. The Big 10 only has three teams within 2 games of .500, and two of them, Ohio State and USC, are in big trouble in terms of their bubble profile and remaining schedule. Oregon is 5-8 in conference, but has a pretty manageable remaining schedule so will probably be safe by Selection Sunday.

The ACC bubble teams are starting to perform as expected given their brutal performance in their non-conference schedule. Wins don't help and losses really hurt. SMU has a lousy NET of 40 despite being 18-5. Pitt needs 21 or 22 wins to even get in the discussion for an at-large.

The MWC has four bubbly teams (New Mexico, Utah State, Boise State and SDSU), but they all have a lot of games against each other left and none of them have much margin of error. I would expect one or two to play themselves all the way off the bubble.

My Predictions of total bids by league:

SEC: 12 (11 at-large)
Big 10: 9 (8 at-large)
Big 12: 8 (7 at-large)
Big East: 4 (3 at-large)
ACC: 4 (3 at-large)
MWC: 2 (1 at-large)
WCC: 2 (1 at-large)

34 at-large teams for 36 bids. There is still some cushion in that for upsets or some random team going on a tear. It is also as likely that a team will fall off a cliff as go on a tear, so some of those assumed at-large bids will get swapped as intra-conference games are decided.
You’re evaluating this in terms of us getting in? Or seeding?
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
45,028
Reaction Score
35,573
You’re evaluating this in terms of us getting in? Or seeding?

Seeding is more complicated, but the analysis kind of covers both. One of UConn’s problems is the lack of potential quality wins to boost its seeding profile compared to other teams likely to be Top 6 seeds. We really need St. John’s, Creighton and Marquette to win out against all the other Big East teams, because a losing streak by any of them would be really bad for UConn’s metrics.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
2,644
Reaction Score
10,289
Seeding is more complicated, but the analysis kind of covers both. One of UConn’s problems is the lack of potential quality wins to boost its seeding profile compared to other teams likely to be Top 6 seeds. We really need St. John’s, Creighton and Marquette to win out against all the other Big East teams, because a losing streak by any of them would be really bad for UConn’s metrics.
Pull for Baylor to miracle upset Houston tonight.
 

Online statistics

Members online
321
Guests online
1,881
Total visitors
2,202

Forum statistics

Threads
161,316
Messages
4,258,882
Members
10,093
Latest member
CoreyBellDT


.
..
Top Bottom