I was thinking the same thing last night. Thought there were a few times she could have been called for a foul compared to the Iowa players.Iowa needed to play with more pace. Implement a zone for a couple of reasons. And if they could hit mid range shots and free throws they would have won easily. I’m a Crooks admirer, but she drew a kind whistle.
I always think that good home crowd can influence the ref whistle. I sum it up as part of home court advantage. Fronting with Steulke (i.e. countering with athleticism instead of size) and being aggressive on the perimeter to prevent the post pass seemed to be the best playing card for Iowa. Iowa State looks really good. They remind me of a lite version of the Gamecock championship team with Boston. I think they are an Elite 8 type of team to me but I think it is going to come down to matchups with Crooks on how far they go in the tournament.I was thinking the same thing last night. Thought there were a few times she could have been called for a foul compared to the Iowa players.
Home crowds definitely have an effect, but using the Stuelke fronting example, there were times I couldn't understand how refs could overlook how Crooks was pushing to establish herself. Some physicality is expected, but Stuelke looked like a rag doll at some points which is what had me perplexed.I always think that good home crowd can influence the ref whistle. I sum it up as part of home court advantage. Fronting with Steulke (i.e. countering with athleticism instead of size) and being aggressive on the perimeter to prevent the post pass seemed to be the best playing card for Iowa. Iowa State looks really good. They remind me of a lite version of the Gamecock championship team with Boston. I think they are an Elite 8 type of team to me but I think it is going to come down to matchups with Crooks on how far they go in the tournament.
I don't know if it was just Iowa State but I came away a little disappointed with Iowa. I like Chit chat but otherwise I thought their guard play wasn't up to the Iowa standard, especially when #1 was on the court. She did not look in sync with the rest of the team. I was also kind of disappointed that Steulke hasn't developed an outside shot over her college career.
They could have also used Stuelke or whoever Crooks was guarding in pick and rolls. Crooks can’t guard that. Or still even…play Stuelke at the 4 even without a jump shot. She has decent handles for her size.Home crowds definitely have an effect, but using the Stuelke fronting example, there were times I couldn't understand how refs could overlook how Crooks was pushing to establish herself. Some physicality is expected, but Stuelke looked like a rag doll at some points which is what had me perplexed.
The development of guards is a question mark for Iowa. I know a couple players are still out due to injury but I'm not sure if they're impact players at that position. We'll see how they bounce back once they get into conference play.
I'm with you regarding the lack of Stuelke's outside shot. Last season, they were trying to play her in the 4 and get more opportunities, but that didn't last. It's something she needs for the next level.
Still don't understand it, but I find it adorable every time I see these videos.
Well, at the moment, there is very little proof ISU is a good team. only speculation. They beat Iowa, whose only semi-quality win was Baylor. Baylor's only semi quality win was Duke. Baylor has Texas on Sunday so we will get a better assessment of them-which I think Texas will blow them out. ISU does not play another team with a pulse until Baylor on Jan 4. Even if they win that game, it may be that Baylor is not as good as people thought.I thought Iowa-Iowa State was the most enjoyable game I’ve seen this season. I’ve always enjoyed Iowa’s style of play, and I’m a huge fan of the Brown/Crooks duo. The game also makes me question our prevailing wisdom that you have to play a tough non-conference schedule to get your team ready for good teams. Iowa State has played virtually no one good all season, but they looked really sharp last night. Maybe Mulkey has been onto something all along. 😵💫 There’s no denying her teams always seem ready when the schedule gets tougher. More than one way to skin a cat, I reckon.
I still don’t like it, though.
Well, at the moment, there is very little proof ISU is a good team. only speculation. They beat Iowa, whose only semi-quality win was Baylor. Baylor's only semi quality win was Duke. Baylor has Texas on Sunday so we will get a better assessment of them-which I think Texas will blow them out. ISU does not play another team with a pulse until Baylor on Jan 4. Even if they win that game, it may be that Baylor is not as good as people thought.
I was thinking the same thing last night. Thought there were a few times she could have been called for a foul compared to the Iowa players.
Appreciate the feedback and glad it didn't come across as a dig against her. I enjoy watching her play but do find the officiating when she plays confusing.Most Cyclone fans will never admit it but she is getting very kind ref star/diva treatment. She gets treated like she is made of delicate china at times and if you touch her it's a foul.
Yeah I'm curious to see if TT is actually pretty decent this year. I guess same w/ Arizona St., but I'm not really convinced they are.Only three Big 12 teams ranked now, #9 TCU, #10 ISU and #15 Baylor. OSU drops out and is with Texas Tech as the #26/#27 teams. TT will finally play someone* next week as they play at Waco. Maybe a win could move them closer to sneaking in.
* "Finally play someone" is typed with full acknowledgement that my Cyclones have played a Charmin Soft non-conference schedule saved only somewhat by rival Iowa being a good team.
The Sun Devils may fall from the unbeaten ranks Sunday. 5:00 p.m. tip against the Buffs and this will be a real challenge for Molly Miller.ISU, TCU, TT and ASU are all undefeated.
Collectively the four teams have played a grand total of two Quad 1 games so maybe "undefeated" should have an asterisk.