Iowa is zone def teamAs noted earlier...Iowa's D is suspect
So many open shots for the Turtles in the first half
and their defensive rebounding is not stellar either.
Bad combination against Maryland
Probably 100...they're at 79 with 29 seconds left end of the 3rd. Even if Brenda calls off the dogs, the bench has been tremendous too.Looks like MD will put at least 95.
I predicted 96-71 yesterday. Would been almost right ... if the game was only 35 minutes.Looks like MD will put at least 95.
Neither of these teams play anything remotely resembling effective defense. If Uconn can't beat either by double digits they don't deserve to be national champion. I'm not interested in statistical permutations. On the court is all that counts this year.Probably 100...they're at 79 with 29 seconds left end of the 3rd. Even if Brenda calls off the dogs, the bench has been tremendous too.
They never said that. They simply pointed out the difference in point differential between Maryland and UConn vs. top-25 teams, which is unfair given the sample sizes and Maryland's two losses. They were making the case for Maryland as a 1-seed, not denigrating UConn.I'm watching the MD/Iowa Big Ten Championship. The announcers were talking about the #1 seeds. They are such UCONN haters it is unreal. They really think we shouldn't be a number 1 seed. They talked about how good Stanford is and the fact that UCONN lost to Arkansas, and Maryland beat Arkansas. So they think we should be a 2 seed. They never mentioned South Carolina, or Texas A&M, losing. The bias is unbelievable. This was too funny!!!
It was in Nov: 115-96MD - Arkansas would be an interesting game
Well, MD scored with .7 seconds left. So, Brenda is not the type to "call off the dogs". guess she's not going for the sportsmanship award.Probably 100...they're at 79 with 29 seconds left end of the 3rd. Even if Brenda calls off the dogs, the bench has been tremendous too.
Disagree. In order for Maryland to be a number one seed, they have to replace someone. And they were making the case for UConn to be the #1 to be replaced..They never said that. They simply pointed out the difference in point differential between Maryland and UConn vs. top-25 teams, which is unfair given the sample sizes and Maryland's two losses. They were making the case for Maryland as a 1-seed, not denigrating UConn.
Could be wrong but I’m sensing a different vibe in Maryland this year. I get the sense they may be a tougher out than they have been in the recent past.They haven't pulled their typical late season egg laying this year...
Fear the turtle.
No they weren’t. But you want to hear what you want to hear.Disagree. In order for Maryland to be a number one seed, they have to replace someone. And they were making the case for UConn to be the #1 to be replaced..
Way overrated.Big Ten is overrated in WCBB.
How so?Way overrated.
Its you that need your hearing checked. THEY definitely were making the case that Maryland should replace UCONN on the one line.No they weren’t. But you want to hear what you want to hear.
Could it also be that they're playing to the audience watching? Every network has some kind of spin on it for the fanbase watching. Hyping a BIG10 school during championship game only makes sense for marketing purposes.I'm watching the MD/Iowa Big Ten Championship. The announcers were talking about the #1 seeds. They are such UCONN haters it is unreal. They really think we shouldn't be a number 1 seed. They talked about how good Stanford is and the fact that UCONN lost to Arkansas, and Maryland beat Arkansas. So they think we should be a 2 seed. They never mentioned South Carolina, or Texas A&M, losing. The bias is unbelievable. This was too funny!!!
How so?
I don’t think anybody would rank them above #3 Perhaps a significant minority would rank them # 4 behind the Big 12. Perhaps you are one of those, but 3/4 is not “way” overrated.
perhaps you would rate them #5 - behind the ACC. Is that true?