Do whatever it takes to fill the Rent, cut prices, run special events, do targeted give aways but fill the place. It helps us by 1) improving the game day experience, 2) improves our national attendance numbers, which in turn improves our CR profile, and 3) let's people see the product, which I suspect will be much improved this year. Once they are used to the experience, they will be more likely to come back.He was on again today. I only heard a bit. This guy gets it. They have hired 11 people whose only function is to sell tickets
5 years ago...how about in June of 2003 when Perkins left for Kansas! Let's be honest Hathaway and Austin put UConn in it's current predicament with CR.He talks have been the same since day 1. I agree that he gets it. Too bad he wasn't here 5 years ago.
Yes, you are correct.5 years ago...how about in June of 2003 when Perkins left for Kansas! Let's be honest Hathaway and Austin put UConn in it's current predicament with CR.
Does any one have a link to the podcast for us people living away from CT
I agree. They were on point and elicited interesting answers.I was actually impressed with the questions Gresh asked during Benedict's time on the show.
All of his answers were interesting. I'd paraphrase his overall message as follows:Please explain how the answers were interesting, as I am hoping that I missed something. Rhetoric about how UConn has to improve to be P5 worthy
What could he have said that wouldn't elicit snark from you? I'm thinking nothing.So don't hold them responsible. It's not their fault. They are just along for the ride - but make sure you donate enough so they have an argument to get paid.
Smart leadership though - it's the fault of those who came before us.
What could he have said that wouldn't elicit snark from you? I'm thinking nothing.
I do believe that there is a difference between pandering and lobbying. Remember, UConn was resting on its laurels, while Mr. Jurich was aggressively lobbying for Louisville. I was never one for standing back and waiting for something to happen.All of his answers were interesting. I'd paraphrase his overall message as follows:
Since UConn is currently in the AAC we will be a proud supportive member of the AAC. Any fruitless hoping, scheming or begging for a different outcome simply saps the vibrancy of our institution as it aims for athletic supremacy in the conference. That's the reality. On the other hand, UConn has the athletic pedigree, facilities, academics, demographics and cable metrics to be attractive to any conference, including the Big XII, ACC and the B1G, should any of them decide to further expand their respective footprint. No amount of pandering will make it happen any sooner. Thus, for now our focus needs to be on achieving success on the playing fields, getting folks in the stadium for an enhanced experience, fixing complaints re parking and concessions and supporting our university’s many bold academic, athletic and research initiatives. Thank you and goodnight.
I do believe that there is a difference between pandering and lobbying. Remember, UConn was resting on its laurels, while Mr. Jurich was aggressively lobbying for Louisville. I was never one for standing back and waiting for something to happen.