I know, right! The same could be said about Dan Hurley or Geno Auriemma. We really need to focus on hiring less competent people just so we won't be at risk of a program with deeper pockets stealing them!There are dozens of schools that have deeper athletic pockets than UConn with worse ADs. Recognition doesn't help us because it either makes make him more attractive to those schools or it costs UConn more money just to keep him.
You made me think his leaving was imminent.There are dozens of schools that have deeper athletic pockets than UConn with worse ADs. Recognition doesn't help us because it either makes make him more attractive to those schools or it costs UConn more money just to keep him.
Thanks for the half empty glass.There are dozens of schools that have deeper athletic pockets than UConn with worse ADs. Recognition doesn't help us because it either makes make him more attractive to those schools or it costs UConn more money just to keep him.
I know, right! The same could be said about Dan Hurley or Geno Auriemma. We really need to focus on hiring less competent people just so we won't be at risk of a program with deeper pockets stealing them!
#plannedmediocrity
So basically you will use any excuse to insert a Star Trek reference.We have had other ADs leave, Lou Perkins is an example, there are better AD jobs. My point is that the AD award doesn't help UConn a bit. There is only a downside. It's a lose/lose. The Kobayashi Maru for the good guys.
The same could NOT be said for our basketball coaches. There is NOT a better basketball gig for Hurley or Geno to pursue. Hell, Hurley already turned down the Lakers. And Calhoun flirted with South Carolina (we'll never know how much) before turning his back.
In this case with Dave, the glass is completely empty.
You think other athletic departments didn't already know how great of a job he was doing? You think this award made him visible from under the rock we were hiding him?? Lol! Good for Dave. He has earned this award and then some. Any big time program that was or is looking for a new AD would already be seeing his success. An award doesn't change their ability to find him.There are dozens of schools that have deeper athletic pockets than UConn with worse ADs. Recognition doesn't help us because it either makes make him more attractive to those schools or it costs UConn more money just to keep him.
Hey, I'm in complete agreement with you. Excellence is a reason to complain and mediocrity is a blessing. "Ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise"We have had other ADs leave, Lou Perkins is an example, there are better AD jobs. My point is that the AD award doesn't help UConn a bit. There is only a downside. It's a lose/lose. The Kobayashi Maru for the good guys.
The same could NOT be said for our basketball coaches. There is NOT a better basketball gig for Hurley or Geno to pursue. Hell, Hurley already turned down the Lakers. And Calhoun flirted with South Carolina (we'll never know how much) before turning his back.
In this case with Dave, the glass is completely empty.
YesSo basically you will use any excuse to insert a Star Trek reference.
Hey, I'm in complete agreement with you. Excellence is a reason to complain and mediocrity is a blessing. "Ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise"
Well, I'm inclined to believe that competence, and particularly extraordinary competence is a good thing and brings more rewards than troubles. Your view, as noted above, is that it brings "nothing but trouble."What I said is "nothing but trouble" will come from it. But that was an interesting interpretation.
Yes, don't assume smart people are in charge.I don't understand how winning this award hurts. Do we really think this puts AD Dave on the radar screen? Anyone in the business has to already be aware of the unprecedented job he's been doing.