Sandy did just roll through...travel to the northeast isn't at the top of my list either right now
@Compton_Magic: Jordan Bell is down to Oregon and Auburn. Will officially visit Auburn next weekend. MagicNation!
His aau team.
No, but maybe after the millionth time--or the tenth 180 by a recruit--Manuel will realize that he has knee-capped the basketball program with the perception of an interim coach in whom the school is not invested, and he will extend Kevin for at least another season like any remotely competent AD would have done in the first place.Because the whiners want something to use to complain about the contract for the one millionth time.....
Cause, you know, after the millionth time Herbst will fire Manuel and hire a "good" AD who will extend Ollie's contract to 4 years....yeahhhhhhhh
Well then that was ages ago. At least 2 months ago. People on here were talking like if we offered, he'd commit tomorrow.It was before Calhoun retired when Bell made the statement about committing to UConn if we offered.
This was suppose to be our back up, our plan B, our lay up, and we MISSED. That is a problem. Yes I'm going to B**** and complain on a message board. That is part of its purpose. We can all hold out and pretend we have a shot at Vonleh, but not getting Bell hurts and no one should be okay with it.
I guess this is as good a place to chime in. I sadly got a kick out of you sarcastim. How sad it is that we can't close the deal with a shotblocking big who actually came out and said he'd sign if offered.If it was a dual-threat quarterback, i'd understand. But we can't out recruit Oregon or Auburn for a shot-blocking athletic big who called UConn his dream school?
Don't you people understand? Honestly, who gives one flying %&#$ if we lost a recruit. It's how we lost him. If we lost a recruiting battle between Auburn and Oregon, it's pretty damn clear that something is seriously wrong. You're stupid if you think this won't make a difference with Vonleh or any other potential recruit.
I was afraid that if XRM committed elsewhere, which he did, would cast a bad perception for other recruits that UConn is not the place to go right now. I think if he had committed it could have had a reverse impact. Sort of like upward and downward momentum we see in the stock market. Right now it's a bear market when it comes to UConn and I don't know how long this spiral will take place.
But as it stands now, it sure looks bleak when we see a typical offensively raw, but shot blocking big who loved us just weeks (months?) ago bails on his visit and cuts us from his list.
If that's the case, why in the world did he even have a visit scheduled if he hadn't sat for the SATs. It's a req that everyone, or atleast everyone should, knows has to be done before a recruit can take an official visit on a program's dime.from a Duffy article today about Ollie, he wasn't allowed to visit because he hasn't taken his SAT, I wonder if grades is possibly an issue for UConn being eliminated
Ollie talks often about "the classroom," a hot topic these days in Storrs. UConn posted an embarrassing 11 percent graduation rate when the figures were released last week, and the university clearly needs to reshape its image when it comes to men's basketball and academics.
Long Beach Poly Tech senior Jordan Bell, considered a top-100 forward recruit, told Hearst Connecticut Thursday that his official visit, initially scheduled for this coming weekend, was blocked because he hasn't yet taken the SAT.
Read more: http://www.ctpost.com/uconn/article/Kevin-Duffy-Test-at-UConn-begins-for-Ollie-4002133.php#ixzz2B6IK3mrz
I am so tired of people not comprehending one simple fact: Of all the negative things you cite--and which you admit has a negative impact on recruiting--there is only ONE that we had the ability to control at this point: Ollie's contract.I am so tired of people making assumptions in this thread where they have no freakin idea what reality might be. Right now, UConn is in a deep hole when trying to recruit anybody. It's not just because the current coach has a short contract, although I'll don't doubt that has some impact. But look at the entire picture. We don't have the practice facility and it won't be there for a couple years anyhow. You can't sell recruits on a facility they might be able to use in a couple years. We are currently banned from post season play. While that doesn't directly affect current recruits, it puts a dark cloud over the uni. You don't think other coaches are telling parents 'They can't even play in the post season this year because they don't care about academics. Do you want to send your son to a college that doesn't care about the classroom?' Doesn't matter if that's reality or not, the perception is there and hurts our ability to recruit (and will for several years).
You (and I) have no actual idea why kids are backing off. Not a one has come out and said it's Ollie's contract. It's equally likely that they could be thinking 'Do I want to play for a coach who has yet to coach a game at any level?' There are just so many negative things out there right now. Stop coming to the conclusion that it's only about the contract. That's just stupid and self serving for some emotional ideal you have.
Don't get me wrong - I'm 100% behind Ollie and hope he is the coach that can keep us on top. Every great coach has started with zero games coached. Most (all?) not at this level, but that doesn't mean he won't be fine. My one problem is not having the background at lower levels. I'm sure any of you that are great at your job didn't start being as good as you are now. You learned stuff as you went that made you better. I really can't imagine my first job being the one I'm in now. I would have been in way over my head. But there are savants out there and it's not like he hasn't seen great coaching, so you never know.
Bottom line, there are tons of bad things out there and most all of us have no idea why recruits are backing off. Until you have something that's real, stop deciding that your idea is the only one that can possibly be right.
<rant off>
Well said Tenspro. As you pointed out, a lot can happen between now and the spring signing period and all it takes is landing a big time recruit or a couple of very good ones to round off a solid class.These.
Losing Bell himself isn't a calamity, except that it sends a further, confirming signal to other recruits that UConn is on the downswing. DM was exactly right to draw the analogy to the stock market, and not only are we in a bear market, we are experiencing a crash. Our value in the eyes of recruits is cratering.
That is a huge problem, and one which isn't necessarily reversible.
I am so tired of people making assumptions in this thread where they have no freakin idea what reality might be. Right now, UConn is in a deep hole when trying to recruit anybody. It's not just because the current coach has a short contract, although I'll don't doubt that has some impact. But look at the entire picture. ...Bottom line, there are tons of bad things out there and most all of us have no idea why recruits are backing off. Until you have something that's real, stop deciding that your idea is the only one that can possibly be right.
<rant off>
I am so tired of people not comprehending one simple fact: Of all the negative things you cite--and which you admit has a negative impact on recruiting--there is only ONE that we had the ability to control at this point: Ollie's contract.
UConn can't get the practice facility built instantly.
UConn can't change the post-season ban.
UConn can't change what other coaches tell these kids or their parents.
UConn can't give Kevin more experience than he has.
But UConn could have given--and still could give--Kevin at least a two season contract to give potential recruits some assurance that the coach who is recruiting them will be here when they get here if they commit.
It really, really, really baffles the mind that so many people could be so obtuse not to see that voluntarily adding a significant and definite negative factor to a list of other factors that are both out of our control and only possibly negative is a very obviously stupid and self-defeating thing to do. IMO it is an inexcusable move by our vaunted AD, but I'll settle for recognition that: (a) it is negative; and (b) it is needlessly self-imposed.
And please save the multi-year and fiscal policy arguments. I'm talking TWO years, with a buy-out if things go south. Not multi-year, and a drop in the bucket compared to what we'd pay anyone else for one season, let alone two.