I keep wavering on this topic. He's on Mt. Rushmore, no question (Bazz, Kemba, Rip, Emeka - IMO, with Ray as the 5th if we're choosing five). Those are the four Alpha Dogs on national title teams, and Ray was 49-5 in the Big East with two 2 seeds and a 1 seed in his career (he and Doron had the best overall careers in UConn history for entire body of work- that three-year run was pure dominance). All five were first-team A-As in the top three in the NPOY race..
Of those five, only Emeka and Ray did not have a bad season (Emeka was part of a 5 seed as a soph, which was inconsistent, but not bad)
Of those five, only Rip and Emeka did not have a bad postseason loss (Rip BET as a freshman, notwithstanding)
Of those five, only Kemba and Bazz were the sole All-American caliber players on title runs doing all the heavy lifting (Rip had KEA, Emeka had Ben)
Of those five, only Rip and Ray led their teams to 1 seeds (Kemba was part of one as a freshman as a reserve, Emeka probably would have without injuries - they were an awesome 2)
Of those five, only Bazz won twice (obviously), but he was the only one who played all four years
I personally still lean Kemba by a nose (Kemba-Bazz-Rip-Emeka-Ray would be my order, based on UConn-ness). He had a team of freshmen around him (and a sophomore AO), and was a notch more dominant in his postseason run than Bazz was, who had more upperclassmen help around him (Boat-DD-Giffey, and to some degree Kromah, who was older but new to the program). That 11-for-11 run is something special. And he was our best player on the floor for (perhaps) all 11 of them, with the exception of maybe the Butler game (he may have still been our best player despite shooting 5-18, given his energy level, nine hustle rebounds, etc.), but he was probably a bit drained by the title game and perhaps you could hold that against him (but then you have to make note that Brimah bailed Bazz out in the first round - Bazz dribbled off his leg o/b with two mintues to go and missed a chippy that Brimah followed up). DD was our best player against ISU/Florida and Boat might have been our best player against St. Joe's (but Bazz also allowed DD to be our guy on those two days he had it going by taking on a facilitating role, so that shouldn't be held against him).
Bazz gets bonus points for sticking with us and his importance to the program, but Kemba's run was almost as important, because people were kicking sand on our graves after the NIT year, JC's impending retirement, and our recruiting "failures" that led to the Napier-Giffey-Olander-Lamb-Smith class. Bazz wins that standoff, though - would have been easy to leave, and with the conference realignment problem and an umproven KO, we could be wallowing right now without him.
It's a tough call - but I do enjoy the problem of trying to sort out where all this greatness fits together. Maybe I lean Kemba because of the 5-in-5 on top of the title, but I have no issue whatsoever with those who say two rings gives Bazz the edge.
If this was the Premier League and every game counted the same, then I'd probably lean Ray by a nose over Rip (in my lifetime) with Emeka, Donyell, and Kemba 3-4-5 and Bazz a smidge behind. Ray had two A-A years for top five teams. Donyell had maybe the best singular season, but Ray-Rip-Emeka were better as sophomores. Bazz would drop since he was never part of a team that finished in the top 20 in the regular season. But this isn't the Premier League, so this paragraph is meaningless.