SMU set the standard for qualifying for the death penalty. For those of you not up to speed on the particulars that caused SMU to get that death blow, here's the reader's digest version:
The Southern Methodist University football scandal (also known as Ponygate) was an incident in which the football program at Southern Methodist University was investigated and punished for massive violations of NCAA rules and regulations. The most serious violation was the maintenance of a slush fund used for "under the table" payments to players from the mid-1970s through 1986.
This culminated in the NCAA handing down the so-called "death penalty" by canceling SMU's entire 1987 schedule. SMU was allowed to return for an abbreviated 1988 season, but opted to sit that season out as well after school officials determined it would be impossible to field a viable team. The severity of the penalty left the SMU football program in ruin.
The Mustangs had only one winning season over the next 20 years and failed to make another bowl game until 2009. To date, it is one of the most severe penalties ever imposed on a Division I program, and the only time the NCAA has canceled a football-playing school's entire season at any level.
So I guess the question is, does the overall cumulative transgressions, school, conference and NCAA rule violations qualify Baylor for the death penalty? Was what SMU did as egregious as this?
And if not, why?