Basketball cliches you dont like (and other sports too) | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Basketball cliches you dont like (and other sports too)

The name of the game needs to be changed from basketball to netball.

Jimmy Naismith ain't walkin' through that door.
 
The kid is a thoroughbred.

He's an absolute stud.

What a wingspan.
 
The one that irks me every time I hear it is "score the ball." It literally makes no sense. The last two words are completely unnecessary.
 
When a player is "in the zone' does not actually mean he is in the zone (defense).
 
"We lacked focus" and "We were focused". What drivel.

But my all-time dislike is not spoken, it's visual. Why must directors pan the crowd/parents/teammates/coaches, etc following a scoring play? Meanwhile play continues, sometimes well beyond half-court, out of view. Show us the reactions during STOPPAGES in play.
 
Oh come on you cliche haters, where would sports announcing be without cliches?

 
"They don't need a 3 here"...when they absolutely need a 3 there
This is the worst. 85% of the time an announcer says it, everyone watching knows either:
  • it's over already, and they needed threes the last three trips, or
  • they absolutely need a three.
 
This is used a lot in hockey, when a goalie gives up a bad goal and they say, "He wasn't ready for that shot." What is he doing in net if he isn't ready?
Standing on his head?
 
exit velocity

Baseball announcers (especially the Mets) are enamored with exit velocity. Exit velocity is meaningless. A ball hit with an exit velo of 100 but is caught is an out, A ball ht with an exit velo of 75 but drops in for a hit is a hit,

Which is better?
 
How about when you lose a game the talk is about heart and the other teams wanting it more .
 

Online statistics

Members online
31
Guests online
1,386
Total visitors
1,417

Forum statistics

Threads
163,960
Messages
4,376,757
Members
10,168
Latest member
CTFan142


.
..
Top Bottom