Baseball #'s and juiced balls | The Boneyard

Baseball #'s and juiced balls

Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
52,869
Reaction Score
194,444
The balls are clearly juiced again this season. For a sport where everything is judged off of #'s it seems rather silly to be so reliant on historical numbers when there's been all these seasons with juiced balls and juiced players.
 
A recent study actually shows them traveling 4’ shorter than LY.
Data also shows that across most MLB stadiums, home runs as a percentage of fly balls hit in March, April, and May are at an eight-year low.
 
I don't think the ball is juiced necessarily.

For one thing, pitchers sit in the mid-90s and because they are not saving anything for the late innings, they can still reach back for something extra. If a hitter makes contact...well the fast it comes in, the fast it goes out.

Secondly, I think the pitch clock has more of a negative affect than first glance as well

Finally, I still think they are searching for an advantage, but pitchers are monitored much closer for using sticky stuff.

.............

The moment when MLB was forced to finally admit the pervasiveness and address the pervasive Spider Tack epidemic in the sport:

 

Online statistics

Members online
32
Guests online
868
Total visitors
900

Forum statistics

Threads
164,092
Messages
4,381,899
Members
10,183
Latest member
TagTen901
..
Top Bottom