- Joined
- Apr 1, 2013
- Messages
- 7,379
- Reaction Score
- 19,802
She is limited only because she doesn’t get the minutes to start flowing in the game. UConn’s offense is so wide open she will not disrupt the lane. She will take so much stress off that offense with her transition game which suits Paige to a tee.I would def take her 4ft shot over the current: “ hang around the arc-3pt clanging-pass around even when wide open” they are getting now. Also is Anna really 6’2”? She has no defensive skills, no footwork and clangs 3 after 3 when she does shoot. I could go on and on about other issues but they winning. But stick in Aubrey for her and see how much better everyone gets with just that move! I am sure Paige wouldn’t mind. That would be a big loss for Uconn if Aubrey leaves.
If you could explain satisfactorily how Aubrey opens the lane when her and Liv are in the game (unless you want to move Liv out on the perimeter for the majority of the game which I don't find appealing) then I'm with ya totally. Because Aubrey can't shoot she doesn't start imo. I'd love her to be able to shoot- but so far she has shown she can't. Otherwise please provide multiple examples of where you've seen her nail consecutive jumpers outside the lane at UCONN.
And the comment that "she can't get in the flow of the game" is an excuse. Over the years there have been players from UCONN had to play 15 minutes or so to start their 1st year or 2 and some work out and some don't. Hopefully she'll work out but 15-16 minutes or whatever- but -she has an absolute chance to show.
And a further point-- she is not ideal for Paige in halfcourt sets. The game is more than just transition. If you can't get fastbreaks going then you need to execute in the halfcourt offensively. The ideal players for Paige in halfcourt imo are either a player that can score BOTH in and out, or an electric efficient perimeter scorer.
In terms of Anna- I told you why I thought Aubrey wasn't starting. My reply did not reflect one way or another who should start.


That is a rather shallow analysis. In summary your analysis and request for "faith" would require us to ignore roughly 30% (11 of 37) of the games that Anna has actually played in. What software or analyst would consider 30% of a sample size of 37 to be statistically insignificant?