Whatever. I'll be shocked if he's not top ten by the end of next season.
I'm not going to complain too much about the ranking coming off an NIT appearance, but as others ITT have mentioned, the constant downplaying of UConn's 2014 championship has grown old. It's funny - UConn has won two championships in five years, yet still, even people on this board characterize it as somewhat of a fluke. News: he beat Wright, Hoiberg, Izzo, Donovan, and Calipari in succession. This somehow is, on one hand, evidence that much of Ollie's reputation was formed during a small sample, yet, in reality, the sample was anything but small. And he didn't bull s*** his way to those wins by some act of God - he straight up outcoached all of them.
There's clearly a double standard in the way these coaches are evaluated. Tom Izzo is obviously a hell of a coach, but how many times have they underperformed in the regular season only to figure things out in March. When that happens, though, it's less a concern of sustainability and more an opportunity for the national media to fawn over the Spartan coach (exhibit A, him being ahead of Pitino on this list). I can see the Rothstein tweet now: January, February, Izzo.
And I don't have a problem with it, because college basketball - more than any other sport - is predicated on development. Hell, you're coaching freshman and sophomores a lot of the time, obviously many of them are going to be better by year end; UConn's propensity to win titles at low odds hardly invalidates that point.