I just want to make sure that I have this right: Your issue with Aresco essentially is that he failed to get rid of one half of the teams that had hired him to negotiate a tv contract?!? Are you serious???
Just to refresh everyone's memory, Aresco was hired on or around August 14th of this year. This is what the league looked like:
Football Members: UConn, Rutgers, Temple, USF, Cincinnati, Louisville
Basketball Members: Georgetown, Notre Dame, Villanova, Seton Hall, Providence, St. John's, Marquette, DePaul
Football Members not yet here: SMU, Houston, Boise, SDSU, Memphis, Navy, UCF (with no voting rights)
you dont have it right... where did i suggest aresco jettison any cuurent members? if anything, i thought thats why i said wm should reach out to cincy, boise, and byu. aresco cant. its not in arescos interest as head of be if boise, cincy, and uconn bolt to form a new 16 member league.
aresco brought in tulane and ecu... nothing has been a rush, so why bring in those dead weights. that is issue number one with aresco.
my second issue is that he is still going after bb only despite the seismic shift that just happened with the mwc. the be model is dead. to a fault, aresco is focused on the hybrid model which wont work long term, and right now, doesn't look good short term for the western schools.
about the only thing you got right was your last statement... it was a good call.
So your major issue with the man is that he didn't jettison eight of the thirteen teams that hired him so that the other six teams could thrive. Good call, Marty...