as observed once by Lew Perkins, "I've never understood a game that fans cheer when you almost score."Soccer is godawful
as observed once by Lew Perkins, "I've never understood a game that fans cheer when you almost score."Soccer is godawful
Clock counting upward is maddening, and when they go into extra time it's laughable. Stop the clock when the ball goes out of bounce for God sakes.Soccer is godawful
says someone who probably doesn't understand the game at all
I am not complaining....
View attachment 67940
....At all
View attachment 67941
Growing up I had a huge crush on both. I guess it helped me to develop my love of the sport.
I understand it plenty my kids have played premier level youth through HS.says someone who probably doesn't understand the game at all
LOL - and the soccerheads are the ones going off on us "not knowing the rules"
Hockey offsides and Soccer offsides, aside from sharing a word, aren't even remotely close.
If anything, the former "2-line pass" is closer to soccer offsides, but it was eliminated for stupidity and eliminating exciting play - go figure.
Sounds like you just don’t like the sport and that’s fine but unless you are talking about the Champions tour, the overweight old men/PGA thing is like 30 years old. Guys like Koepka, DJ, Rory, Finau, heck even Tiger are in outstanding shape. The John Daly, Craig Stadler types as a whole are long gone
I was a big tennis fan in late 70's and early 80's.
McEnroe, Edberg were my two favs. Didn't like Connors, Lendl, Becker. McEnroe v Bjorg at Wimbledon was must watch TV.
Wasn't a fan of Agassi when he started but once he cut the hair and took the game seriously he was fun to watch.
Sampras is really last guy I liked.
Out of the big three, I like Joker the best. Federer has been incredible. Can't stand Nadal. Still a one trick pony on clay. He's a highly talented player on grass and hard court but no where near an all time great without clay.
Now, it's boring. Players are too big, strong and conditioned for the court.
I'm golf they can make the course longer, move bunkers, reshape greens, make greens faster, etc. Even though the technology in golf has gotten borderline out of control for pros, courses which are over a hundred years old can still be relevant. Tennis? Not so much. Same ball and same size court but the skill level and nuances with spin, lobs, cut shots just isn't there for me.
On the girls side I caught Chrissy towards the end of her run and Navratilova's dominance. Liked Seles but hated her grunts. I liked Sharapova as a contrast to Serena but her doping killed any respect for her.
You are hard pressed to argue for any other female athlete other than Serena for most dominant of past 50 years. Most female tennis players are done by 30 and the greats get another 2-3 years. Serena's skill and ability to dominate well in to her 30's is incredible.
All that being said, I don't think I've seen 5 matches in last decade.
You forgot Martina Hingis. I was a big McEnroe fan, then liked Becker. I'm a serve and volley guy. Almost everybody is just a power baseliner now. It's boring. Federer at least comes to the net now and then. Agree with you on Agassi, I grew to like him.
Soccer people don't need merde. They already have the best game and don't care if other's take it or leave it, it's your loss. Come and join us if you want to have fun anywhere in the world. I swear some of you sound sillier talking about soccer than you did talking about COVID.You get baseball’s thing.
Soccer people need to find their own for their incredibly simplistic game.
Race car driving is absolutely a sport. It involves physical endurance, skill, and extreme focus during competition. End of discussion.Are we saying driving a car is a sport? Only thing athletic about it is holding your piss for an absurd amount of time
Diving is tough. I actually like watching it, but at the end of the day, it is still an arbitrarily judged competition. Also, the pools at the Brazil Games totally grossed me out.I'll watch speed skating. Ice skating and Ice Dancing? Nope.
Cliff diving from Acapulco? Sounds like fun to watch. Spring board in to a pool? Pass.
Curling? big time watch. Mesmerizing.
MMA? Liked it better when there were fewer rules and styles were more varied. Now it's become normalized and it's much less compelling to me. fighters are in better shape and have a greater skillset but part of the "charm" was to see how different fighting techniques held up against others.
I've become much more of a fan of high school sports and minor leagues than major league and college games.
Hooray for you! My son plays lacrosse because he hated soccer, he'd get hit - hit back and get in trouble. Hitting other kids and doing it with a stick is fun so he's in. I'm holding off on investing in professional lacrosse, but its a GREAT youth sport for skills, dexterity, athleticism, team building and spectators.1) I watched one ncaa tournament on espn (the year umass went to the finals)
2) I’m a baseball player, as far as I’m concerned lacrosse is just kids who can’t hit a curveballf
Hooray for you! My son plays lacrosse because he hated soccer, he'd get hit - hit back and get in trouble. Hitting other kids and doing it with a stick is fun so he's in. I'm holding off on investing in professional lacrosse, but its a GREAT youth sport for skills, dexterity, athleticism, team building and spectators.
He also plays baseball and the only way I can tolerate that spectator-wise is to coach. Baseball games are slow, way more errors than plays, more balls than strikes and 1/3 of the kids playing have no clue (Lacrosse forces kids to care). However baseball is fantastic for mental aspects and I really enjoy coaching and watching my son play. But baseball is not his favorite (Lacrosse for physicality) or mine (basketball, duh).
That doesn't make changing a tire a sport, imo. Another crappy sport is rodeo.Car racing is absolutely a sport. There is a reason that pit crews are made up of former college athletes.
This is kind of a disconnect as clay is the one surface that equalizes the power quite a bit, leads to longer points and rewards athleticism versus brute strength. So hating on the big & strongness of tennis and hating on the ONE guy that excels when the importance of strength is leveled is just hating.Out of the big three, I like Joker the best. Federer has been incredible. Can't stand Nadal. Still a one trick pony on clay. He's a highly talented player on grass and hard court but no where near an all time great without clay.
Now, it's boring. Players are too big, strong and conditioned for the court.