Borzello puts those together and he is an AP voter so that’s probably his ranking unless he includes other factors in these power ranksNot part of the poll, but ESPN power rankings: College basketball Power Rankings: Baylor is back at No. 2, Saint Mary's enters the fray
15. UConn Huskies (21-7)
Previous ranking: In the waiting room
This week: at Creighton (Wednesday), vs. DePaul (Saturday)
UConn moves into the rankings following its home win over Villanova on Tuesday and its road victory at Georgetown on Sunday afternoon. The Huskies have now won five in a row and 11 of their last 14 games, to give them a real chance at a top-four seed come Selection Sunday. Contrary to some past Dan Hurley-coached teams, this season's iteration is led by its offense. UConn has a top-20 offense nationally and the second-ranked offensive unit in the Big East. The Huskies are elite on the offensive glass and are one of the best 3-point shooting teams in the league. Over their last four games, they've scored at least 1.06 points per possession in each game, making at least 41.7% of their 3-pointers in each of their last 3 games. According to Bart Torvik's metrics, they're No. 11 in the country in adjusted offensive efficiency over that stretch
Really this does not bother me, however if it was Cuse a whole lot different story.God seeing Providence at 9 pisses me off so much
since the frauds just beat creighton by 20, how much should we beat them by? also 20? since we're better than the frauds but this game will be at creighton?The country will see soon enough if they're frauds or not
nova played a gauntlet of a non-conference schedule, which is why they have 7 losses. their resume is definitely better than ours at the moment, although i agree that we are underrated.Im curious what most voters would say makes us #18 and Nova #11. Same record, and Nova's best wins are probably us, PC, and Tennessee. Our best wins are Auburn, Nova, and probably Marquette on the road. In any event, our top two wins are against more highly ranked teams than theirs. Is it just a higher early season ranking that's keeping them that much ahead of us?
How does Gonzaga stay at #1 after getting manhandled by St Mary’s?Borzello puts those together and he is an AP voter so that’s probably his ranking unless he includes other factors in these power ranks
Poll inertia is a real thing so that's part of it, but they also won @ Xavier, @ PC, and @ Seton Hall which more than cancels out our win @ MarqIm curious what most voters would say makes us #18 and Nova #11. Same record, and Nova's best wins are probably us, PC, and Tennessee. Our best wins are Auburn, Nova, and probably Marquette on the road. In any event, our top two wins are against more highly ranked teams than theirs. Is it just a higher early season ranking that's keeping them that much ahead of us?
They played a tough non-con but they also lost all of them except for Tenn. You shouldn't get credit for that if you don't win.nova played a gauntlet of a non-conference schedule, which is why they have 7 losses. their resume is definitely better than ours at the moment, although i agree that we are underrated.
Because everyone else in the top 6 lost tooHow does Gonzaga stay at #1 after getting manhandled by St Mary’s?
In addition to what others said, Nova is 7 and 12 in the NET rankings and Kenpom, respectively and we’re 17 and 19. I’m sure these and other rankings influence voters more than than anything since they can’t watch or know who teams have played and beaten/lost to.Im curious what most voters would say makes us #18 and Nova #11. Same record, and Nova's best wins are probably us, PC, and Tennessee. Our best wins are Auburn, Nova, and probably Marquette on the road. In any event, our top two wins are against more highly ranked teams than theirs. Is it just a higher early season ranking that's keeping them that much ahead of us?
Their fans on Twitter play a big part in my hate for them. Along with their recent success aided by good fortune.Really this does not bother me, however if it was Cuse a whole lot different story.
I still don’t get it, St Mary’s has had some embarrassing losses.Because everyone else in the top 6 lost too
nova played a gauntlet of a non-conference schedule, which is why they have 7 losses. their resume is definitely better than ours at the moment, although i agree that we are underrated.
Villanova’s losses include UCLA, Baylor and Purdue. They’ve had a much stronger schedule. I think it’s fair, although I’d think we’d be more in the 14-16 range.Im curious what most voters would say makes us #18 and Nova #11. Same record, and Nova's best wins are probably us, PC, and Tennessee. Our best wins are Auburn, Nova, and probably Marquette on the road. In any event, our top two wins are against more highly ranked teams than theirs. Is it just a higher early season ranking that's keeping them that much ahead of us?
Villanova’s losses include UCLA, Baylor and Purdue. They’ve had a much stronger schedule. I think it’s fair, although I’d think we’d be more in the 14-16 range.
Do you not see the irony in your argument that we should be ranked ahead of Nova because our top 2 wins (one of which is vs Nova) are better than their top wins?Im curious what most voters would say makes us #18 and Nova #11. Same record, and Nova's best wins are probably us, PC, and Tennessee. Our best wins are Auburn, Nova, and probably Marquette on the road. In any event, our top two wins are against more highly ranked teams than theirs. Is it just a higher early season ranking that's keeping them that much ahead of us?
When did he argue that we should be ahead of Nova?Do you not see the irony in your argument that we should be ranked ahead of Nova because our top 2 wins (one of which is vs Nova) are better than their top wins?
But they pretty much lost to every good noncon team they played. I get it, though. I agree that they're the better team and should be ranked higher. I just don't see how the difference could be more than 3 or 4 spots tops.
agreed that you don't get credit for teams you don't beat, but you also don't get dinged for losing AT ucla, AT purdue, and AT baylor. those would be the three toughest games on uconn's schedule. if nova played some random squads at home or at a neutral site, they'd be 24-4 right now.Poll inertia is a real thing so that's part of it, but they also won @ Xavier, @ PC, and @ Seton Hall which more than cancels out our win @ Marq
They played a tough non-con but they also lost all of them except for Tenn. You shouldn't get credit for that if you don't win.
Purdue game was at Mohegan Sun, remember? We were basically there!!agreed that you don't get credit for teams you don't beat, but you also don't get dinged for losing AT ucla, AT purdue, and AT baylor. those would be the three toughest games on uconn's schedule. if nova played some random squads at home or at a neutral site, they'd be 24-4 right now.
Purdue was neutral, but you should absolutely get dinged for only scoring 36 points.agreed that you don't get credit for teams you don't beat, but you also don't get dinged for losing AT ucla, AT purdue, and AT baylor. those would be the three toughest games on uconn's schedule. if nova played some random squads at home or at a neutral site, they'd be 24-4 right now.