Wichita State is a one seed because they won every game. The real question is SMU vs. NC State. SMU has a flawed resume, no question. But I have yet to see an argument that NC State has a better one.
Because Coach K said so!
Wichita State is a one seed because they won every game. The real question is SMU vs. NC State. SMU has a flawed resume, no question. But I have yet to see an argument that NC State has a better one.
You joke, but there was literally no talk of them as a tournament team until K opened his mouth. A win over Syracuse is nice, but it wasn't exactly a rare occurrence these past few weeks.Because Coach K said so!
I can't believe the league pays Aresco $1MM a year for this. Can anyone point to a single achievement by him? Just one would be fine.
or on the campaign trailAresco is in the Bahama's. I understand that is where leaders go when questions need to be answered.
Someone in the AAC needs to address the seeding and 3 in same region!
Their OOC SOS is a joke. They lost games, in conference, to horrid teams. Their RPI was 53. My point is there is a reasonable explanation for their exclusion. Is the SOS argument also one that could support WSU being a 3 or 4? Yes. However, when a team goes 32-0, has a solid RPI and played in the final four last year I think the countervailing argument is stronger.
Someone in the AAC needs to address the seeding and 3 in same region!
The silence is deafening.
How quickly you forget about Tulsa
But, Tulsa did make the Dance. I hope they can knock-off both Ohio St. and UCLA as it would be good PR for the American. I suspect I will be able to count on one hand how many times Louisville and the American are mentioned in the same sentence in a positive light on their march to the Final 4.
I agree, they could easily have left the seeds the same, but put the four AAC teams in four different brackets.
Don't be too proud of Louisville, or feel too slighted for them. They aren't really an American team.
?
So the answer is do not play anybody in the rpi top 25??
That's exactly his point. Any praise Louisville gets will be either attributed to them on their own, or discussed in the context of how they make the ACC more competitive next year.
You won't hear anything about how they won a league featuring more ranked teams than any other conference, a league that then got completely shafted by the Committee.
That is fair and makes too much sense. This and the seeding (low)
Surprises me, along with UNC not starting in Raleigh with their butt buddies, Duke. How'd those Southern boys let that happen? couldn't squeez 'em in with the Hoos?