Taking a team further is one thing, overall performance as a player is another. I don't know if that's part of the panels' thought process. I understand this is the UConn portion of the board, but why does it seem like posters have to diminish what Morrow accomplished?
Shouldn't UConn fans be happy that a player from a Big East team not named UConn earned this award? Doesn't this help to defeat the lazy talking point that the Big East is a weak conference when non-UConn fans want to find something to dig?