- Joined
- Nov 21, 2012
- Messages
- 4,634
- Reaction Score
- 9,910
I do not disagree that ND deserved a 2 seed, but that was not a team who looked like a typical 2. Do they have one guy who plays in the league?UNC was a 7 loss team when they were seeded. A 7 loss team that won 18 of its last 20, went 14-2 in the ACC, made it to the ACC finals, and lost to Duke. They went from 7-4 in late December to 26-6 in the ACC title game in March. That's a hell of a run.
Notre Dame was 14-4 in a Big East that had 11 NCAA teams. They had a number of really good wins, including a season sweep of the future champs.
That Georgetown that had a 6 seed was 20-5 before a major injury, and went into the tournament at 21-10. They had the #1 SOS according to the RPI. A 6-seed is a perfectly reasonable seed for them.
And Syracuse went in at 26-7, with some a number of big wins. I mean, sure, they lost to Seton Hall badly, but we've had good teams beaten badly by poor wons, doesn't mean they aren't good team deserving of their seed.
That was my point, these teams no doubt deserved their seed but their records was a product of the rest of the teams were just not that good. Like being the tallest midget.
2011 was seen as a down year for the sport from the start of the season. This year definitely has a better crop of teams.