- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 9,379
- Reaction Score
- 23,680
Don't really like this trade for Boston - I understand the concept of trading Garnett and Pierce so you can tank for an Andrew Wiggins, Jabari Parker, or Julius Randle type player, but Garnett and Pierce are still extremely good players who could take a team from "fringe contender" to "contender" (which might be the toughest step to make in the NBA). Memphis, OKC, LAC, NY, Indiana, and Chicago are all teams looking to add that final ingredient to an already impressive core, and all those teams have valuable commodities they may have been willing to part with to increase their title odds. Here is a list of moveable assets on the teams AI just mentioned:
Chicago - Jimmy Butler, Marquis Teague, Taj Gibson
Memphis - Ed Davis
OKC - Jeremy Lamb, Perry Jones III
LAC - Eric Bledsoe, DeAndre Jordan
NYK - Iman Shumpert
Indiana - Lance Stephenson
The problem with the draft picks Boston received in return is they don't figure to be lottery picks. With Paul and Griffin in the fold likely for the long haul in LA, it seems highly unlikely any of the picks they shipped to Boston will dip below 20 or so. Brooklyn, meanwhile, just recently signed Deron Williams to a long term deal and Brook Lopez is still only 25. So now Boston's in a situation where they're hoping the mid-first round picks they are receiving in return for two borderline all-stars turn into decent rotation players, when all the players I listed above are already that or at least appear to be headed that way.
I'm no expert on the salary cap so maybe the cap flexibility of the teams mentioned above restricted Boston's options, but the point is, I feel like there were better trading partners who could offer more immediate help than what Brooklyn was offering. And that doesn't even include teams like Houston and Dallas - both of whom could have positioned themselves as "fringe contenders" following the free agency period - in my projections. What if Houston signs Dwight Howard and suddenly the Rockets are interested in flipping you Chandler Parsons for Paul Pierce or Kevin Garnett? I think Boston would have been better served to at least wait things out and see if they could field a better offer than what they accepted from Brooklyn.
Chicago - Jimmy Butler, Marquis Teague, Taj Gibson
Memphis - Ed Davis
OKC - Jeremy Lamb, Perry Jones III
LAC - Eric Bledsoe, DeAndre Jordan
NYK - Iman Shumpert
Indiana - Lance Stephenson
The problem with the draft picks Boston received in return is they don't figure to be lottery picks. With Paul and Griffin in the fold likely for the long haul in LA, it seems highly unlikely any of the picks they shipped to Boston will dip below 20 or so. Brooklyn, meanwhile, just recently signed Deron Williams to a long term deal and Brook Lopez is still only 25. So now Boston's in a situation where they're hoping the mid-first round picks they are receiving in return for two borderline all-stars turn into decent rotation players, when all the players I listed above are already that or at least appear to be headed that way.
I'm no expert on the salary cap so maybe the cap flexibility of the teams mentioned above restricted Boston's options, but the point is, I feel like there were better trading partners who could offer more immediate help than what Brooklyn was offering. And that doesn't even include teams like Houston and Dallas - both of whom could have positioned themselves as "fringe contenders" following the free agency period - in my projections. What if Houston signs Dwight Howard and suddenly the Rockets are interested in flipping you Chandler Parsons for Paul Pierce or Kevin Garnett? I think Boston would have been better served to at least wait things out and see if they could field a better offer than what they accepted from Brooklyn.