Don’t want either one. Starling can’t shoot and Mintz simply does what he wants. They are both right where they should be
All Multi-Time Transfers Granted Immediate Eligibility (Until 12/27)
- Thread starter navery12
- Start date
McLovin
Gangstas, what's up?
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2018
- Messages
- 2,955
- Reaction Score
- 18,735
Fair. The NCAA doesn't seem to care about enforcing any of their own rules. The whole point of the 1 free transfer thing was "no waivers ever, no exceptions" and then instantly started granting some guys waivers and exceptions. Maybe the real solution is to abolish the NCAA haha.
NowInStorrs
The truth is out there.
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2017
- Messages
- 1,719
- Reaction Score
- 9,402
If anyone at Louisville can take advantage of this, they probably should.
- Joined
- May 27, 2015
- Messages
- 15,226
- Reaction Score
- 103,611
I mean it makes sense. If you play, you use eligibility (outside of medical redshirts).
I don't know what they were thinking before. Maybe worried about punitive repercussions for the TRO, but it's just normal rules.
HuskyHawk
The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2011
- Messages
- 34,401
- Reaction Score
- 90,877
Smart and will cause some hesitation among these players. The antitrust challenge here is really, really weak. They are defining the labor market way too narrowly. The market for people making money playing basketball includes a whole lot more than college. If you thinking sitting out (and still getting a scholarship) is a hardship, go overseas, go to the G-League or to Ignite.
What does Baker have to do with this? They simply implemented a rule that makes sense and which was standard for years before Covid. I think everyone on the board agreed one transfer rule would need to come back. It's the court challenge that is ridiculous here.