AJax on ESPNU now Bucks vs Nets | The Boneyard

AJax on ESPNU now Bucks vs Nets

Joined
Nov 11, 2018
Messages
1,634
Reaction Score
6,921
He looks really good. From the limited sample. Hit a 3, caught an alley oop and forced a turnover in a 2 minute window. He could be the surprise of the draft. Ah, and we wanted to bench him.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
35,453
Reaction Score
31,308
He looks really good. From the limited sample. Hit a 3, caught an alley oop and forced a turnover in a 2 minute window. He could be the surprise of the draft. Ah, and we wanted to bench him.
They aren’t guarding him 10’ from the basket. He’s got a way to go.
 

storrsroars

Exiled in Pittsburgh
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
20,009
Reaction Score
40,037
I see Nets are playing off AJax. Just missed a wide open 3. So-so line of 5 pts, 5 reb, 1 asst, 4 TOs in 21 mins thus far, but a horrendous -25 +/- for the game.

Bucks are really sloppy in 2nd half.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
35,453
Reaction Score
31,308
He still needs to develop a mid-range shot besides that ugly floater he does. He would be money if he had that midrange to go with his dribbling, rebounding and defense.
Yup, we know. Hope he works it out. Really hoped he’d be back for #6.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,487
Reaction Score
2,221
He's blocking the drives to the hoop, but unfortuneatly taking the driver into the stands as well - and 2
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
12,450
Reaction Score
66,223
He was doing his usual Jackson stuff. Grabbing and going in transition. Finding guys. Defending. Playing with pace and intensity.

But the Bucks just missed every shot and layup and threw the ball away a bunch and then the Nets just took the ball down in transition and drew a foul. That was basically the entire 3rd quarter.

His man sagging may have contributed to some of the offensive struggles, because they were digging down hard on drives off him, but his teammates weren't moving the ball when the help came. They just let the defender come down and swipe the ball.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
8,266
Reaction Score
22,629
He looks really good. From the limited sample. Hit a 3, caught an alley oop and forced a turnover in a 2 minute window. He could be the surprise of the draft. Ah, and we wanted to bench him.
“We”?
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
12,450
Reaction Score
66,223

2.06 mil guaranteed. Y1 fully, Y2 partially.
That's... not great. If that's accurate that's less guaranteed than Chris Livingston their last pick got.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,869
Reaction Score
8,171
That's... not great. If that's accurate that's less guaranteed than Chris Livingston their last pick got.
Its close. According to that site, Livingston got 3 guaranteed.

They both got about 7m/4years with 2-3 guaranteed. But you're right that something seems off. I wouldnt be surprised if Spotrac made a mistake.
 

caw

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,137
Reaction Score
13,040
That's... not great. If that's accurate that's less guaranteed than Chris Livingston their last pick got.

Yeah, it appears so. Which is odd. I guess it's because of Livingston's age? They probably think he can grow more as a player.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
12,450
Reaction Score
66,223
Its close. According to that site, Livingston got 3 guaranteed.

They both got about 7m/4years with 2-3 guaranteed. But you're right that something seems off. I wouldnt be surprised if Spotrac made a mistake.
It's also only getting one year fully guaranteed. It's going to be hard for him to stick in the league if he doesn't have a guaranteed roster spot, because teams are less likely to invest minutes in you. It really puts pressure on him to contribute this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: caw
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
12,450
Reaction Score
66,223
Livingston being the last pick is a bit misleading when comparing contracts, he shut down all workouts a few weeks before the draft because he'd already agreed to a contract behind the scenes. The Bucks basically just floated him down to their last pick
Yeah but he wasn't projected to be a top 40 pick either. He was like consensus late '40s, behind Sanogo.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
5,516
Reaction Score
13,319
Yeah but he wasn't projected to be a top 40 pick either. He was like consensus late '40s, behind Sanogo.
I don’t think so Sanogo was the biggest up hill battle . The scouts hated him of course , he doesn’t check the right boxes for todays NBA and those guy are box checkers to the max but he impressed enough coaches to get a buzz. With Jackson the question was not if but where . Incredible athlete who sees the floor like few and is an elite passer. Skills more appreciated today. His handle is above average for a guy that can transition to rim protection. People who passed on him will regret it .
To me he was a lock for that type of open floor NBA even more so than the college game .
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
12,450
Reaction Score
66,223
I don’t think so Sanogo was the biggest up hill battle . The scouts hated him of course , he doesn’t check the right boxes for todays NBA and those guy are box checkers to the max but he impressed enough coaches to get a buzz. With Jackson the question was not if but where . Incredible athlete who sees the floor like few and is an elite passer. Skills more appreciated today. His handle is above average for a guy that can transition to rim protection. People who passed on him will regret it .
To me he was a lock for that type of open floor NBA even more so than the college game .
Talking about Livingston.
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2012
Messages
5,666
Reaction Score
25,126
That's... not great. If that's accurate that's less guaranteed than Chris Livingston their last pick got.
I believe both got almost identical deals as part of the the new nba 2nd round agreement. The difference we see I think is Ajax having his second year option partially guaranteed and Livingston’s is fully guaranteed.
 

Online statistics

Members online
515
Guests online
4,912
Total visitors
5,427

Forum statistics

Threads
157,115
Messages
4,084,099
Members
9,979
Latest member
Texasfan01


Top Bottom