At this point most Trilly info is in his paid discord so links won't be possible. Would have to be screenshots which might be frowned upon since it's paid content.
Having said that, I can't imagine any reason why someone would lie about it.
Aren't people technically not supposed to share the Trilly stuff now that he paywalls it on his discord?
These two replies are helpful, because they provide context and additional information. In doing so, they reveal to me that what I souggtcwhen I wrote, "Link?" was something to boost the credibility.
In one of the Liam thread, for example, he posted something like, "There have been whispers," which could be substance-free, gossip-columnist, agitation, hype mongering to build excitement. I seen it numerous in in the past few years, and I've similarly seen the, "Oh so what, it's sports. I it's all hype. Doesn't matter if it's not true," or, little circling back to clarify when things turned out to be wrong or false, etc. I'm not a fan, nor do I think it's "the end if the world" or a "capital crime" as some people defend themselves, when nobody has ever raised objection by using such exaggerated terms.
What you've written educates me (and others) that Trilly's posts are now paywalled and therefore not as easily linked, screenshot, or otherwise displayable, for technological or ethical reasons. In that sense, you gave me a greater confidence.
There's a difference between
Here's a link...
Here's a screenshot...
I read it on Donovan's Discord because I subscribe, but I don't directly share subscriber content because I respect the distribution channel
I read it in a tweet or post or otherwise by a guy who's a subscriber, but I'm not a subscriber, so I didn't actually see it, but I figure that the guy has little motivation to lie based on how he's presented info over time.
By these various ways we present it read information, we make determinations about credidibility of sources and reliability if information. It's part of the reputation-based market if ideas that applies in many fields.
I still regard Ant as more prone to chase excitement and operate as a tout more so than an infirmed and informing and trustworthy source. I don't see him as a disinformant, a troll, or someone operating against UConn's interest. To the contrary, he's active, enthusiastic, and wants to make an impression. I don't think he prioritizes getting things right enough to keep him from leaping before more fully looking. I think he wants to be out front, probably for ego purposes, and he gets hits & misses from swinging the bat so often. I suppose he serves a net-positive purpose.
When I question him, I similarly intend to provide a net-positive purpose, even if I may collaterally kill some of his buzz when I do so. It's an instance where diversity of opinion serves freedom of speech by offering more if it and a mechanism if checks g balances. There's no doubt that there are readers who find his and my excesses annoying.
Sick bro. You know what I meant. Autocorrect
I've already discovered that I'll have to train the phone through repetition, if his becomes a name that is regularly used. Same for Koby.
I've already successfully (and pretty easily) done it for Samson, Tristen, Clingan, Sanogo, Hassan, Bouknight, Jaylin, Jayden, Stephon, and others. Even Roumoglou, once I learned the correct spelling (unless I've got it wrong). Spencer was never an issue. It's mostly a matter of being attentive in early use.