Huskyforlife
Akokbouk
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2013
- Messages
- 13,128
- Reaction Score
- 55,780
Ideally explain your choice.
Have we forgotten how great Emeka was? He averaged 4.3 blocks per game for his career, and was able to stay on the court for 30+ mpg because he didn't foul. He was also a go-to scorer in the way that Clingan never was.It’s Clingan and it’s not close IMO. We saw last year just how much having an all-world rim protector can cover up a lot of defensive deficiencies.
Yea unless big Don is on the roster, Emeka is the move.Have we forgotten how great Emeka was? He averaged 4.3 blocks per game for his career, and was able to stay on the court for 30+ mpg because he didn't foul. He was also a go-to scorer in the way that Clingan never was.
Love Clingan, but he's second at best.
That’s how I voted. I’m pretty confident with what we have at the other 4 positions. If we could lock in Butler at the 3, we would crush it. As you noted, he also brings the toughness we were missing last year.Butler gives toughness, an essential championship attribute.
If we’re picking for a team to go play 2004 style of basketball, you’re probably right. But playing 2025 style of basketball, I think Clingan’s length and drop coverage is more impactful.Have we forgotten how great Emeka was? He averaged 4.3 blocks per game for his career, and was able to stay on the court for 30+ mpg because he didn't foul. He was also a go-to scorer in the way that Clingan never was.
Love Clingan, but he's second at best.
Clingan per 40 minutes his freshman season- 21.1 pts, 17.1 rebs, 5.5 blocks, 1.4 assists, 1.3 stealsHave we forgotten how great Emeka was? He averaged 4.3 blocks per game for his career, and was able to stay on the court for 30+ mpg because he didn't foul. He was also a go-to scorer in the way that Clingan never was.
Love Clingan, but he's second at best.
Okafor’s Junior year was better than Clingan’s Sophomore year. That is what the prompt is here. Which of our past players, at their best, would be the add.Clingan per 40 minutes his freshman season- 21.1 pts, 17.1 rebs, 5.5 blocks, 1.4 assists, 1.3 steals
Okafor per 40 minutes his freshman season- 10.5 pts, 12 rebs, 5.4 blocks, 1.1 assists, 1 steals
Clingan per 40 minutes his sophomore season- 23.1 pts, 13.1 rebs, 4.4 blocks, 2.7 assists, .9 steals
Okafor per 40 minutes his sophomore season- 19.3 pts, 13.6 rebs, 5.7 blocks, .7 assists, 1.1 steals
#'s don't tell the story on Clingan, he was a human wall defensively. Players simply didn't challenge him. I didn't think I would ever see a more dominant defensive player at UConn than Okafor but Clingan was just that. If he stayed for a third season he would've three-peated in his three college seasons.
No.Okafor’s Junior year was better than Clingan’s Sophomore year. That is what the prompt is here. Which of our past players, at their best, would be the add.
I went with Ray anyways so it’s not my fight, just throwing my 2 cents in to what I thought would be pretty cut and dry.
KEA-ConfidenceIdeally explain your choice.