Work in Sports and Ortho PT myself, we are affiliated with a d1 (not at UConn level competitive) school. The previous post made a lot of statements generally regarded in the field (length of rehab, specific focus of rehab). One thing I will argue (at least in the case of my organization is that ACL repair/reconstruction isnt always "pro operation". It is suggested when the patient has intention to keep level of intensity of specific sport/activity. We instruct many non athletes that life can be perfectly lived without an intact ACL provided proper strengthening is maintained.
In an ideal world, you work for a period of time prior to surgery ("pre-hab") to strengthen and go into the surgery in a stronger/more prepared state. When dealing with scholarship athletes who want to get better as soon as possible, they are typically in great shape going in as well as knowledgeable of what needs to be done/how to do it. Its still something we focus on even with how short of a timeframe we are given.
As for Return to sport, the poster (and wife) is spot on with 9 month range minimum. There is always an extensive test performed and I imagine multiple times given the status of Uconn's program to determine the readiness of the athlete to go back to training with the team. PTs will clear the athlete based on their performance during this RTS evaluation.
You can never give a proper answer as to why the frequency of ACL injuries in the UCONN program occurs. Even if you are working with the team, there is always the possibility and "things can happen" with human bodies unfortunately. I would venture to guess their resources have provided them a phenomenal quality of care and personally would not point fingers. Rehab is never the same, even with the same injury of the same patient. Just have to address it day by day and motion by motion.
My prayers go out to these athletes and anyone recovering from injury. Its a wild journey.